Tuesday, January 05, 2010

Paul Krugman: That 1937 Feeling

Here's an interesting opinion from Paul Krugman posted on NY Times: That 1937 Feeling

  • Here’s what’s coming in economic news: The next employment report could show the economy adding jobs for the first time in two years. The next G.D.P. report is likely to show solid growth in late 2009. There will be lots of bullish commentary — and the calls we’re already hearing for an end to stimulus, for reversing the steps the government and the Federal Reserve took to prop up the economy, will grow even louder.

    But if those calls are heeded, we’ll be repeating the great mistake of 1937, when the Fed and the Roosevelt administration decided that the Great Depression was over, that it was time for the economy to throw away its crutches. Spending was cut back, monetary policy was tightened — and the economy promptly plunged back into the depths.

The great mistake of 1937? Here's why..

  • Which brings us to the still grim fundamentals of the economic situation.

    During the good years of the last decade, such as they were, growth was driven by a housing boom and a consumer spending surge. Neither is coming back. There can’t be a new housing boom while the nation is still strewn with vacant houses and apartments left behind by the previous boom, and consumers — who are $11 trillion poorer than they were before the housing bust — are in no position to return to the buy-now-save-never habits of yore.

  • What’s left? A boom in business investment would be really helpful right now. But it’s hard to see where such a boom would come from: industry is awash in excess capacity, and commercial rents are plunging in the face of a huge oversupply of office space.

    Can exports come to the rescue? For a while, a falling U.S. trade deficit helped cushion the economic slump. But the deficit is widening again, in part because China and other surplus countries are refusing to let their currencies adjust.

    So the odds are that any good economic news you hear in the near future will be a blip, not an indication that we’re on our way to sustained recovery.
    But will policy makers misinterpret the news and repeat the mistakes of 1937? Actually, they already are.

    The Obama fiscal stimulus plan is expected to have its peak effect on G.D.P. and jobs around the middle of this year, then start fading out. That’s far too early: why withdraw support in the face of continuing mass unemployment? Congress should have enacted a second round of stimulus months ago, when it became clear that the slump was going to be deeper and longer than originally expected. But nothing was done — and the illusory good numbers we’re about to see will probably head off any further possibility of action.


4 comments:

Gamelion said...

Is this the only reason to keep on
printing more money ?

solomon said...

Whether we like it or not, we will come to the 69er cross road whether to withdraw the stimulus or not.

I believe the keyword we are searching is the business re-investment which likely lead to better job numbers etc. Unwilling to do so signal the biz pessimism that will haunt us later in the year.

Unrelatedly, I am also surprised by the increased court injunctions brought by shareholders towards
listed companies lately. Moolah, what is your thought on this subject?

Moolah said...

I do think the injunctions are rather ludicrous and needless to say, it's rather lopsided against the minorities.

Having said that, if one was a really prudent investor, one has less risk being caught with such corporate shenanigans.

Yup, sadly, the minorities need to ask themselves why 'they are caught in a no-win scenerio'? :/

pica said...

check out Richard Koo's book the Holy Grail of Macroeconomics, which explains exactly why this happened in Japan during the lost decades