Remember:
- "Pan Malaysian Industries Bhd (PMI) yesterday told Bursa Malaysia that it had received an unconditional takeover offer from a consortium of three companies at a cash offer price of 4.5 sen for each offer share."
- 18 May 1993. A 4 for 1 rights issue at 80 sen.
- 31 Jul 1998. A 1 for 1 rights issue at 50 sen.
- 19 Jun 2000. A 1 for 1 rights issue at 55 sen.
- And lastly it had a 2 into 1 share consolidation.
Has the minority shareholder being rewarded handomely by this 4.5 sen offer?
Let's look at a simple study where I assume a minority shareholder, named Ah See, owns 1000 shares of PMI at 0.50.
Ah See initial investment is rm 500.00
Let's see what happens to Ah See if Ah See held on as a minority shareholder till this very day.
1. 1993: 4 for 1 rights issue at 80 sen.
So Ah See's 1000 shares becomes 5000 shares.
Ah See tops up 3200.00
2. 1998: 1 for 1 rights at 50 sen.
So Ah See's 5000 shares becomes 10000 shares.
Ah see tops up another 2500.00
3. 2000. 1 for 1 rights issue at 55 sen.
Ah See's 10000 shares becomes 20000.
Ah See tops up 5500.00
Shares are then consolidated. 2 into 1.
So Ah See's number of shares shinks to 10000.00
Total top up 11,200.00
Initial cost 500.00.
Total investment: 11,700.00
PMI now gets privatisation offer at 4.5 sen.
Ah See own's 10000 shares. That means he will get
Gulp!
Errrrr...... errrr...... errrrrrr...... do you think Ah See got rewarded handomely or do you think Ah See got screwed?
8 comments:
"4500 back"
I am afraid even that is one zero too much ....
Thanks for working out the rights issues, I was too lazy for that. Oh my, it is much worse than I thought.
Ooops... one zero.. too much! :P
OMYGOD!!!
This is beyond horrible... gosh that's another item on my checklist before investing in stocks...
Psalm 109:22 to Ah See??
Someone will step into takeover of PMIIND for the 20% jewel stake in MUIIND?? For I am a small potatoes I cannt help Ah See, hopefully someone will bid up the PMIIND price to block this takeover.....remember the case of Harisson....if I am too young to remember her.
Sorry but I just don't see this happening. Not for PMI and certainly not for this group of company.
Avatar: This is why the issue of 'trust' is so important in investing.
If you cannot trust the owners, then it's best to avoid.
Moolah,
Thanks. I'll remember that. It's too easy to get carried away by quantitative analysis and forget the qualitative part.
Too bad management integrity is not easily measurable.
Rgds
too bad.
Post a Comment