Showing posts with label China Stock Market. Show all posts
Showing posts with label China Stock Market. Show all posts

Friday, June 04, 2010

Andy Xie: Shanghai Stock Market Is The Poor Man Casino

On Businessweek recently:

  • May 24 (Bloomberg) -- A bartender at my neighborhood pub recently asked me how the Shanghai stock market was performing. I said it was at about 2,600 points. He jumped and said, “No! The Communist Party wouldn’t let that happen.”

    He spent the next 10 minutes trying to convince me that the Communist Party would make the market rise to 8,000 in the next three to five years.

    “Look, the Hong Kong market is at 20,000,” he said. “Shanghai at 8,000 would be very reasonable.”

    China’s stock market involves more investors than any other market in the world. There are 124 million brokerage accounts. From what I can gather, the collective enthusiasm of the investing community is still quite strong. The market capitalization is small at 53 percent of gross domestic product and 31 percent of money supply. Prices are at a historical low of 2.5 times book value. Why is the market still going down?

    When the central government introduced tightening measures for the real-estate market, many were hopeful the money would flow out of property into the stock market. A popular yo-yo theory says money travels only between property and the stock market, never anywhere else. The property market hasn’t dropped much, while the stock market is down 20 percent.

    Soft Landing

    Politics and liquidity drive China’s stock market. Neither is favorable. Though the government desires a soft landing, the bubble debate over the property market is over: Tightening is the consensus. The question is speed. When the government squeezes liquidity in the property market, it inevitably decreases it for the stock market. Both markets lose.

    The stock-market pain isn’t just collateral damage. Real-estate price appreciation is the biggest source of profit for businesses, especially in the financial industry. The total stock of properties, work-in-progress, and land banks may exceed three times GDP in value. When the price rises 20 percent, the gain is 60 percent of GDP.

    In a normal economy, corporate profit is about 10 percent of GDP. When capital appreciation is six times that, businesses try to play financial games to turn appreciation into accounting profit. When property prices stop rising, or even fall, very profitable companies suddenly become unprofitable.

    The state-owned banks are lining up for mega fund-raising of as much as 500 billion yuan ($73 billion) in the stock market. While two-thirds is supposed to be raised in Hong Kong, one-third is still a lot for the A-share market on the mainland to bear. About 456 billion yuan was raised in all of 2009.

    Bank Shares

    Banks are normally profit machines. But in one day they can lose it all. A good moment to buy bank stocks is right after a banking crisis. But when lenders are trying to raise so much capital to prepare for a property-market correction, it may not be the best moment to purchase shares in banks.

    Valuations have never presented a strong case to enter China’s stock market. They are now getting there. The current price-to-book ratio isn’t cheap, but it’s reasonable by international standards. I advise you not to pay too much attention to price-earnings ratios. Asset bubbles can distort them so much. The decline in valuation, however, may just be part of a normalization process.

    For a long time, China’s stock market behaved like an Internet stock with a small free float. The recent reforms have made all the shares liquid. Maybe China’s valuations are becoming normal because stocks aren’t valued by off-market trading at a discount anymore. It is a sign of progress. The conclusion: The Shanghai market won’t head back to its record of almost 6,000 points anytime soon. That will disappoint many.

    Market Crash

    Rich people aren’t in the stock market anymore. They are in the property market. An overwhelming majority believe real- estate prices only go up, not down. The people in the market today have no recollection of the market crash of 1997.

    The stock market, on the other hand, experienced a crash in 2007-08 -- from 6,000 points to less than 1,700 in one year. Those who can afford to play the property market find the stock market a bad place to be. This is why real estate has kept booming since 2007, while equities have been struggling. Of course, when the property market drops like shares did in 2007, the stock market will be treated more fairly.

    Stock-market investors in China often can’t afford to enter the real-estate market in big cities. They wish to get lucky, make enough money, and move on to the property market. This force caps the market upside, but not the downside.

    My bartender finally asked me to recommend a stock. He said he had 70,000 yuan and wanted to make enough money to buy a car.

    “I can’t buy a car with my wage income,” he said. “Look at how hard my job is. But, if I make 200,000 yuan in the stock market, I can buy a nice car.”

    As long as property prices don’t collapse, ordinary investors can forget about getting free lunches and new cars from the Chinese stock market. ( source:
    http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-05-23/china-s-stock-market-has-become-a-poor-man-s-casino-andy-xie.html )

Saturday, September 05, 2009

Impact Of US Jobles 'Recovery'...

Posted this morning: Let's Cheer The Jobless Recovery!

Ever wonder the impact of the US unemployment market on the rest of the world?

Surely this is not a non-issue yes?

I was reading Professor Pettit's blog and I found his comments on his latest posting,
The Shanghai market calls the tune, rather enlightening for me.

Here are some of the interesting passages from his editorial.

  • The Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets are still hogging the spotlight. Although down 18.0% from its recent peak exactly one month ago, the past three days have been good for Chinese stock market investors. After rising 0.60% on Tuesday and 1.17% on Wednesday, the SSE composite was up a very smart 4.79% today.

    So what happened? Better-than-expected earnings from Chinese corporations? A surge in US household income and a decline in US unemployment boosting the prospects for China’s tradable goods sector? A huge new loan number for the month of August?

    Actually, none of the above. In fact the US numbers look especially bleak for China. In spite of some seemingly good news on the macroeconomic side, unemployment in the US is still rising, and even that masks the depth of the problem.
    Many Americans who have lost jobs have since then found new jobs, but at lower pay, so that although they don’t show up adversely in the unemployment data, they nonetheless represent lower income to workers as certainly as rising unemployment does, and this will have an impact on future private consumption.

    Societe Generale’s ever bearish Albert Edwards had an excellent piece on the subject on August 6, in which he argues that:

    US nominal household incomes are now contracting at an unprecedented rate. The largest component of household income is wages and salaries which had been declining some 1% yoy. But after revisions the statisticians now admit to an unprecedented 4.8% decline! Total pre-tax household income is now recorded as falling 3.4% yoy in June.

    If US household income is declining so sharply, we can’t really expect a sharp pick-up in imports, even ignoring the fact that households are also in the process of deleveraging, and so cutting back even more sharply on consumption that their incomes might indicate. But in spite of still-bad news in both the external or internal environments, the markets are nonetheless in a much better mood than they were just a few days ago. Why?......
  • .......................... Or, if you prefer Bloomberg’s slightly more forthright explanation:
    China’s stocks rose the most in two weeks on speculation regulators will adopt measures to boost the nation’s equities following declines in the past month. ................
  • There is a general sense that no one wants the markets to misbehave before the all-important October 1 celebration of the sixtieth anniversary of the birth of the People’s Republic. Needless to say this begs the question about when exactly should you, as an investor, get out of the market? The day before? But if everyone knows that, then shouldn’t you get out two days before, or maybe three, since everyone has presumably figured that one out too?

    In 2006, 2007 and 2008 I wrote often about the dangers of this sort of market signaling. There may be perfectly good reasons to want to manipulate the markets with non-fundamental information, but every time this happens it further undermines the development of a healthy capital market that allocates capital based on economic prospects by undermining the value of fundamental information and reinforcing the value of speculation on government intentions
    . Still, on such an important anniversary I suppose it was totally unrealistic to think that the authorities would let angry investors spoil the party.....

ps: DO read the rest of the blog posting.

Yeah... would you cheer the US jobless recovery?

Thursday, September 03, 2009

iCapital Comments On Shanghai SSE

On Star Business: Will rally in Shanghai stock market resume

Some passages caught my attention.

  • However, the 2005-2007 bull market was overdone as the rise, although it was to partially make up for the time lost from 2001 to 2005, became too speculative. Can one say the same thing about the 2008-2009 rally?

What's up doc?

Current market rally for SSE is not speculative????

Well if he says it ain't so, who are we to argue? :)

The last few passages were better.

  • Once the current correction is over, the rally in Shanghai will resume. However, one needs to note that the Shanghai market does not have to move in tandem with the economic cycle on a quarterly or annual basis. A good example would be from 2001 to 2005.

Well let's see.

If market correction is over what could happen?

Hmmm... it could either go up or it go sideways.

And some actually do define a market that moves sideways after a plunge as a phase of market correction.

Hence, by logical reasoning, it's a no brainer (for some) that once the market correction is over, then logically the market should move up.

The next sentence.

  • However, one needs to note that the Shanghai market does not have to move in tandem with the economic cycle on a quarterly or annual basis.

Hmmm.... I agree with that statement. Yes I do. :D

But... but... buttt.... butttt..... what would call a market that does not move in tandem with economic cycle?

Correct me if I am wrong but won't you call this a market that is moving without fundamentals?

And if so, isn't this a speculative market?

The next passage..

  • Whether the current correction will be over soon or it will be a prolonged pause is hard to say but one thing is clear: a repeat of the 2007-2008 or 2001 to 2005 bear market is highly unlikely and a repeat of the 2005-2007 bull market is also unlikely.

Errr.... confusing here for me lah. Sorry lah if I cannot understand.

It just said once the market correction is over, the rally in Shanghai stock market will resume.

And if correction is over, surely then a bear market is impossible to say the very least because if the bear market would to happen, the how could the correction be over?

So I guess it's saying the rally in Shanghai market will continue but it will not be the same as the 2005-2007 bull market. I hope I am not wrong here. So a small bull rally, is it?

The last passage was my favourite.

  • Given the steep and irrational plunge in 2008, it is not surprising that the subsequent rally was so strong but the future trend from now onwards would be more subdued, more gradual, relative to the movements in 2007, 2008 and 2009.

Errr.... errrr.... errrrrhm.... irrational plunge in 2008?

Huh?

Huh?

Is iCapital telling that there is absolutely no justification for the SSE to plunge in 2008????

?

Monday, August 31, 2009

Andy Xie: SSE Should Be 2000 Or Less!

Worried about the current correction in the Chinese Stock Markets? Chinese Stocks Plunge 6.7%; Japan Ends Down




On Bloomberg News: China Stocks ‘In Deep Bubble,’ May Drop 25%, Xie Says

  • China Stocks ‘In Deep Bubble,’ May Drop 25%, Xie Says
    By Erik Schatzker and Allen Wan

    Aug. 31 (Bloomberg) -- China’s economy isn’t “sustainable” and the benchmark Shanghai Composite Index may fall another 25 percent, former Morgan Stanley Asian economist Andy Xie said in an interview.

    “The market is in deep bubble territory,” Xie, who correctly predicted in April 2007 that China’s equities would tumble, told Bloomberg Television.

    The Shanghai index plunged 6.7 percent to 2,667.75 today, the most since June 2008 and entering a bear market, on concern a slowdown in lending growth may derail a recovery in the world’s third-largest economy.
    Xie said the index “should be 2000 or less.”

    The Shanghai gauge slumped 22 percent this month, the worst performer among 89 benchmark indexes tracked by Bloomberg, as banks reined in lending to avert asset bubbles and policy makers advised industries such as steel and cement to curb overcapacity. The decline stopped a rally that had sent the measure up 103 percent from a November low on prospects the government’s 4 trillion yuan ($586 billion) stimulus program and a record amount of new credit would ensure the economy grows at least 8 percent this year.

    “The local market bears are convinced that tightening is already underway,” said Howard Wang, head of the Greater China team at JF Asset Management, which oversees $50 billion. Only “a very strong set of macro numbers in August” or “stronger statements from central authorities” would change this trend, Wang said.

    Global Tumble

    The tumble in China stocks send the MSCI World Index of 23 developed nations down 1 percent at 10:17 a.m. New York time. The Bank of New York Mellon China ADR Index, tracking American depositary receipts, lost 2.6 percent, led by commodity producers.

    At least 150 stocks on the 898-member Shanghai index dropped by the daily 10 percent limit. Industrial Bank Co. and Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. tumbled by the permitted cap after Caijing magazine reported new loan growth this month may be almost half that of July. Lower profits dragged Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., the nation’s biggest steelmaker, and China Southern Airlines Co. down at least 7 percent.

    Chinese stocks are trading at the steepest discount in the world compared with analysts’ price targets after this month’s slump in the benchmark index.

    ‘Bright Spot’

    Equities in China remain “a bright spot” among global stocks because of the nation’s strong growth potential, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said today.

    “We think the market concerns about a near-term ‘exit strategy’ appear premature as the government remains pro- growth,” Thomas Deng and Kinger Lau, analysts at Goldman Sachs, wrote in a research note.

    China may have 200 billion yuan of new loans in August, the Beijing-based Caijing reported today on its Web site. That compares with 7.4 trillion yuan for the first half of 2009 and 355.9 billion yuan in July alone. The government plans to tighten capital requirements for financial institutions, three people familiar with the matter said this month.

    An estimated 1.16 trillion yuan of loans were invested in stocks in the first five months of this year, China Business News reported June 29, citing Wei Jianing, a deputy director at the Development and Research Center under the State Council.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Value Hunting the SSE and Commodity Markets?

Just recently, on May 2008, I posted the following posting, Would you be Bullish On the Chinese Stock Markets?

And Jim Rogers was still bullish and he was mentioned in a Bloomberg news article stating his bullish stance,
Investor Jim Rogers Buys Chinese Shares as Market Hits `Bottom'


  • April 27 (Bloomberg) -- Investor Jim Rogers is buying Chinese shares, among the world's worst performers this year, as the market has bottomed, and he's focusing on agriculture, tourism, airlines and education.

    ``All my new money goes to commodities and China,'' said Rogers, who co-founded the Quantum fund with George Soros in the 1970s and correctly predicted the start of the commodities boom in 1999. He spoke at a seminar in Beijing yesterday.

    ``All the panic looks like a bottom,'' he said. ``I have bought in the last four to five weeks. I've been buying shares in China for the first time in a long time.''
I wasn't.

I wrote the following passage in that blog posting,
Would you be Bullish On the Chinese Stock Markets?


  • At this moment of time, the SSE is only at 3604 pts. Which is LOWER than what it was on May 17th 2007 when the SSE was at 4048 pts. In my opinion, the decline was rather deadly. I mean, the SSE did NOT fall off the cliff but instead it was like rolling off a hill. And because it was rolling off the cliff and not falling off the cliff, I reckon that many did not realise how drastic the fall could be. And sadly, the longer the time pass, the decline eventually turned severe!

And yesterday the SSE closed at 2457.20 pts! The below is a screenshot of the interactive chart loaded on cnbc website, http://www.cnbc.com/id/15837290?q=CN%3bSHI

In almost 3 months time the SSE has lost 1146.8 pts!

And the scariest thing is that if you look at the above chart, it still appears as if the SSE is only rolling down the hill!

However, the bigger picture now shows the exact deadly plunge in this market!

Now of course such a plunge would create curiosity. Contrarians and Value investors surely would be curious if there now exist investing opportunity in the SSE.

Yesterday, John Mauldin's Outside the Box, featured an important essay from Vitaliy Katsenelson, called A Value Investor Looks At China

Here's a rather interesting passage.

  • Oh wait, the story about the shopping mall is not a figment of my imagination (I am not that good) but has already taken place. In 2005 NY Times ran an article titled China, New Land of Shoppers, Builds Malls on Gigantic Scale, it talked about the biggest shopping mall in the world that happened to be in Dongguan, China. The article said:

    "Not long ago, shopping in China consisted mostly of lining up to entreat surly clerks to accept cash in exchange for ugly merchandise that did not fit. But now, Chinese have started to embrace America's modern "shop till you drop" ethos and are in the midst of a buy-at-the-mall frenzy.... by 2010, China is expected to be home to at least 7 of the world's 10 largest malls... Already, four shopping malls in China are larger than the Mall of America. Two, including the South China Mall, are bigger than the West Edmonton Mall in Alberta, which just surrendered its status as the world's largest to an enormous retail center in Beijing." (emphasis added)

    Fast forward three years and you find a very different story: the biggest mall in the world - the South China mall, with space for fifteen hundred stores, only has a dozen stores open for business - it is empty.
    Shoppers never materialized. Billions of dollars have been wasted.

    Analyzing the Chinese economy while it is growing at superfast rates is like analyzing a credit card company or a mortgage originator during an economic expansion - all you see is reward - the growth. But the defaults - the risk - are masked by a healthy economy and constantly increasing new business that is profitable at first. The true colors of that growth only appear after the economy slows down and new accounts mature. (In fact, the banks or credit card companies in the U.S. that showed the lowest loan growth during last expansionary cycle have a lot fewer credit problems than those that did - U.S. Bank Co comes to mind here.)

    The consequences of LSGO are likely to be very painful for China. As of today we don't know how much of the recent growth came from wasteful, unproductive growth. Only after a slowdown will the true problems surface.

And Mr. Vitaliy wrote his opinion on the commodities market and China.

  • It gets worse: high commodity prices
    Chinese demand for stuff (oil, metals, machinery etc...) has a tremendous impact on commodities, driving their prices many fold. High (and rising) commodity prices are negative for developed world economies but they are catastrophic to developing economies - they bring comparatively higher inflation and often stagflation. Here is why:

    Inflation is sourced from two broad categories: commodities (stuff) and wages. Emerging markets are twice as cursed when it comes to inflation:

    1. Commodity prices (less shipping costs and government controls - the Chinese government limits price increases on certain commodities, but we know that doesn't work in the long-term) are the same around the world. Thus the U.S. and China will see a similar increase in commodity prices (at least in dollar terms). But the commodity component represents a larger portion of the total product cost in China than in the U.S., as wages in China are a less significant component of a total cost. For instance, bread baked in the U.S. and China will require the same amount of wheat and wheat will cost as much. But baker wages will be significantly larger in the U.S. than in China and will result in a much higher cost of the finished product. Therefore, a spike in wheat prices will have a larger impact on the loaf of bread in China than in the US.

    2. Wage inflation: the US and Europe have little wage inflation, as rising unemployment has diminished the already weak bargaining power of the labor force, keeping wages in check. Economic expansion has put significant upward pressure on wages inflation in China (and India as well).

    In combination, these two factors were responsible for inflation in
    high single digits in China, double the rate of inflation in the U.S.

    China is not the cheapest place in the world to manufacture, not anymore. To its benefit, cheaper countries (Singapore, Vietnam etc...) are not big enough to steal a significant amount of capacity and the
    US in many cases doesn't have the needed infrastructure to bring manufacturing back. Appreciation in the renminbi and high oil prices (which are driving shipping rates up, placing a significant premium on the distance factor) are making Chinese produced goods even less attractive. Something has to give: either the U.S. will consume less or China will keep prices low to stimulate the demand, swallowing the loss, or a combination of both.

Do give that article a read. Here's the link again: A Value Investor Looks At China

And regarding commodities, FinancialSense market commentator wrote the following piece Commodity Correction - Coming Into an Important Bottom?

How now?

Would you dare go bargain hunting for some Chinese Stocks and do you think the grand commodity bull run is truly dead?

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Would you be Bullish On the Chinese Stock Markets?

As I was making some housekeeping on my blog, I realised that I had highlighting the following article about Investing In China almost a year ago, back on May 18th 2007.

I would like to highlight that posting again:

  • 1. watching Chinese stock prices gallop upward for months, Ding Xiurui wanted a piece of the action. The 45-year-old office worker stood in line at a bustling brokerage Friday to open her first trading account. She brought her sister, who opened an account too. They joined millions of other novice investors who are jumping into a market that has soared to dizzying heights, with prices up nearly 50 percent this year.

    "We still can make money," Ding said as she stood at the counter at Tiantong Securities with the paperwork for her new account. Asked what stocks she would buy, Ding said, "I don't know. I'm still learning."

    2. Economists say the government should take steps to moderate the price surge or risk a sharp fall that could hurt millions of small investors.
    "This is a very critical time. If policy adjustments take place now, the market can still have a sustainable development," said Hong Liang, a Goldman Sachs economist. "The longer they wait, the harder the eventual landing will be."

    3. Enthusiasm for stocks is fueled in part by a lack of other investments in a heavily regulated economy. Famously frugal Chinese families save up to 40 percent of their incomes, but bank accounts pay just 3 percent interest — less than the rate of inflation.

    4. "I have a stable income but in China now a stable income doesn't mean a good life," said a 26-year-old government employee who was opening an account at Tiantong Securities and would identify himself only by the English name Leon. "Seeing other people earning a lot of money, all you can think is, you're earning so little and how can you make more?"


    5. A 60-year-old cleaning woman in the southwestern city of Chongqing is being feted in the media as a market wizard after doubling her 20,000 yuan ($2,600) investment in two months.
    "At a time like this, who can lose money?" the newspaper Chongqing Morning Post quoted her as saying.

    6. The Beijing Youth Daily carried a photo of a Buddhist monk opening a trading account last week at a brokerage in the western city of Xi'an.
    In Nanjing in the east, a man in his 70s mortgaged his apartment to raise 60,000 yuan ($7,800) to play the market, the Web site Shenzhen News Net reported.

    7. "It might be dangerous, but who knows? People thought it was dangerous in March," Leon said

    8. Stock prices are 30 to 40 times earnings, an unusually high ratio for many major markets, which some say makes them unrealistic. "But that is not paying attention to earnings growth, which is very, very strong," Liang said.

    9. "We hear that before 2008, the government won't let prices fall," said Ding's sister, Ding Jingxian. "We're not afraid."


    And the most interesting point in my opinion is number 10.

    10. "We are opening 40 to 50 new accounts a day," said Zhang Jun, the branch's deputy manager. "Six months ago, it was four to five a day." Nationwide, the number of trading accounts has soared by 30 percent over the past year to 95 million, one-sixth of them opened in the past four months, according to the China Securities Depository and Clearing Corp., which is owned by China's two stock exchanges.
    On Wednesday alone, investors opened 552,559 new accounts, the company said.

    Source:
    1st-time investors buy up Chinese stocks

See this clip also: http://www.tudou.com/player/player.swf?iid=6236614

And boy oh boy how the excuberance drove up the stock market.


On May 17th 2007, SSE was at 4048 pts. By Oct 17th 2007, the SSE index reached 6092 pts. An increase of 2044 pts or a whopping increase of 50% in a mere 6 months.

Here is an even more interesting view if you look at the SSE from May 2005 to Oct 2007.



However, as we all know, things did not turn up well. That the SSE has been underperforming is an understatement.

At this moment of time, the SSE is only at 3604 pts. Which is LOWER than what it was on May 17th 2007 when the SSE was at 4048 pts.


In my opinion, the decline was rather deadly. I mean, the SSE did NOT fall off the cliff but instead it was like rolling off a hill. And because it was rolling off the cliff and not falling off the cliff, I reckon that many did not realise how drastic the fall could be. And sadly, the longer the time pass, the decline eventually turned severe!


And this drastic decline was highlighted in the following posting,
Chinese Stock Markets: The Day They Jumped!

  • Published on Seattle Times. Chinese get a taste of investing's downside

    SHANGHAI, China — When emergency workers found Wang sprawled unconscious after having downed two bags of insecticide, he was still clutching the PDA he had been using to check stock prices.

    Like a number of other small investors in China, Wang had bet — and lost — his life savings, about $15,000, on the Chinese stock market. The propaganda office and doctors at the hospital where he was treated said the 36-year-old factory worker had been preparing to get married and that he had hoped to use the money to buy an apartment for his fiancée.Wang's attempted suicide and those of other investors are a heartbreaking consequence of China's great experiment in capitalism.

    In February, Li, a 25-year-old engineer, jumped from the seventh floor of the building where he worked in the city of Chengdu. His company said he had lost a huge amount on the stock market. On March 30, a 39-year-old former ice-cream- shop owner, also named Li, leaped to his death from his apartment building in the inland province of Shandong after losing a third of the $4,500 he had invested.

    As China's stock markets crashed over the past six months, the Communist government reacted in a way most consumer investors like Wang did not anticipate: It watched from the sidelines. It wasn't until last week, after the Shanghai benchmark index's fall to a symbolic milestone, below 50 percent of its peak in October, that Beijing finally stepped in.

However, as it is, it does look as if the worse is over for the Chinese Markets, right?

The correction that everyone was looking for has had happened and after the Chinese Government stepped in to stop the rot in the market back in April, the correction had stabilised, right?

So as it is, would one consider this an opportunity to buy in the SSE?

Some still don't!

Posted on CBS MarketWatch recently: Chinese stocks not attractive, even after correction

  • But the investment newsletters I track are finding it especially difficult when it comes to China. On the one hand are newsletters who are predisposed to seeing huge opportunity in Chinese stocks, and who accordingly tend to downplay any evidence or objections to the contrary.

    On the other hand, some other newsletters appear to harbor an almost jingoistic aversion to investing in China. They accordingly tend to exaggerate the risks and problems that plague the Chinese economy.

    The debate on both sides reminds me of a famous remark attributed to Adlai Stevenson, the Democratic Party's candidate for president in the 1952 and 1956 elections: He was fond of mocking opponents by saying, "Here's the conclusion on which I will base my facts."

    It is against this background that I paid special attention to a recent article that John Dessauer devoted to investment opportunities in China.

    Dessauer, of course, is editor of the Investor's World newsletter. According to the Hulbert Financial Digest, the advice Dessauer has provided in his newsletter since the beginning of 1982 has produced a 10.2% annualized return, in contrast to 9.4% annualized (before dividends) for MSCI's Europe Australia and Far-East (EAFE) index.

    Dessauer earned his bona fides as not being knee-jerk against China over a decade ago, before investing in that country had become so popular. "I first visited China in 1994," he wrote in his most recent issue. "After that, ... I went back many times, visiting many of China's provinces. Starting in 1995, I began writing about the Chinese economic miracle, and I advised buying stocks in companies that were doing business in China."

    Does Dessauer consider Chinese stocks to represent a good value today, with the Shanghai Composite index trading at barely more than half its high set last fall?

    In a word, no.

    For starters, Dessauer is concerned about the speculative motivation of most individual Chinese investors in Chinese stocks, and what it would do to the prices of those stocks if and when they decide to pull out en masse. "The sixfold rise in Shanghai stocks happened at the same time that millions of new Chinese investors flooded into stocks," he pointed out. "
    At times, Shanghai stockbrokers were opening a million new individual accounts a week. Does anyone really believe these individuals are long-term investors?"

    Answering his own question, Dessauer continues: "
    It will be interesting to see how all those millions of individual Chinese who rushed to buy stocks on the way up will react now that the market has fallen sharply. My guess is that many will lose interest in stocks and go back to work to earn back their losses."

    In addition to being concerned about the speculative nature of the Chinese stock market, Dessauer also worries about the "lack of managerial talent in China. Mao killed or severely punished most intellectuals, or any talented people. An entire generation of managerial talent is missing in China. It takes a long time to create managerial talent. China has been making progress with education and training but the problem is still far from solved."

    A third source of concern for Dessauer is "the difficult issue of guanxi, the intertwining of personal and business relationships, which leads to what we would call corruption or nepotism. In China, it has become ingrained that you combine personal and business relationships... I have visited many companies in China -- public, private and state-owned. The business culture is slowly changing, but it is still common to find high-level managers who do not know what 'profit' means, never mind shareholders. There is still a question about who owns what ... If you are still tempted to buy Chinese stocks, take a look at one or two prospectuses for Chinese companies. That is a sobering exercise that should curb your enthusiasm."

    Instead of investing in Chinese companies, Dessauer says that the preferable way to profit from the Chinese "economic miracle" is by investing in "established companies from the developed economics that are succeeding in China."

Interesting views made by Mr. Dessauer, yes?

But what about views from folks like Jim Rogers? Mr. Rogers has been a constant bull on the Chinese Markets for so long already.

For example on March 17th 2007, I made the following posting, And what about Jim Rogers Views?

  • "I've sold out of emerging markets except for China," said Rogers, long a prominent China bull.

    Even in China, the world's fastest expanding economy, Rogers said stocks were overvalued and could go down 30-40 percent.

    But he added: "China is one of the few countries in the world where I'm willing to sit out a 30-40 percent decline."

And in the posting, How now my dearest Moo Moo Cow?

  • "I own Chinese shares. I'm not selling Chinese shares. If the Chinese stock market doubles again this year I'll have to sell, because then it's a full-fledged bubble," he told a media briefing after a speech in Hong Kong.

    "If it goes down 50 percent this year I will buy a lot more Chinese shares. I'm not smart enough to know what it's going to do, but I'm not selling China at all."

    "There's no question that PEs (price to earnings ratios) in China in the A-share market are too high for some companies, but that doesn't mean it can't get much worse. When you have a bubble develop, crazy things happen," he said.

    "The Chinese stock market could double this year, even though it's expensive right now."

And in Novemeber 2007, And What Does Jim Rogers thinks Now?

  • But I'm gearing up. I didn't put in any orders for tomorrow but I'm starting to prepare my list of things to buy in China. Whether I buy this week or this month or this quarter, who knows. But I'm starting to think about buying new shares in China for the first time in a while. And I'm not thinking about buying in America."

And just last month, it was posted on Bloomberg that Investor Jim Rogers Buys Chinese Shares as Market Hits `Bottom'

  • April 27 (Bloomberg) -- Investor Jim Rogers is buying Chinese shares, among the world's worst performers this year, as the market has bottomed, and he's focusing on agriculture, tourism, airlines and education.

    ``All my new money goes to commodities and China,'' said Rogers, who co-founded the Quantum fund with George Soros in the 1970s and correctly predicted the start of the commodities boom in 1999. He spoke at a seminar in Beijing yesterday.

    ``All the panic looks like a bottom,'' he said. ``I have bought in the last four to five weeks. I've been buying shares in China for the first time in a long time.''

    China's benchmark CSI 300 Index plunged as much as 39 percent this year, becoming at one point the world's second- worst performer, amid speculation government steps to quell inflation would hurt corporate profits. The index is a measure of shares traded in Shanghai and Shenzhen.

    The stock market, the world's fourth biggest, surged almost six-fold in the two years through 2007, driven by optimism growth in the economy would boost earnings.

    The slump triggered government moves to support the market, with the latest taking effect April 24, when the tax on stock trading was reduced. Chinese stocks jumped 9.3 percent that day, the most since Oct. 23, 2001, helping lift the index to a 16 percent gain last week.

    Analysts Differ

    Some analysts remain unconvinced the measures will have an effect with Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse Group last week saying China's shares are a ``sell.''

    ``Given earnings deceleration, we do not think such a rally can last,'' Morgan Stanley's Jerry Lou and Allen Gui wrote in a report April 25. ``
    The government's cut of the stamp duty seems to suggest that it is running out of silver bullets.''

    Chinese companies' Hong Kong-listed `H shares' are more attractive than yuan-denominated `A shares,' Credit Suisse's Vincent Chan wrote in a separate note.

    Selling Chinese shares in 2008 ``is a big mistake,'' said Rogers, adding that he had also bought stocks in Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong. ``I have never sold any Chinese shares.''

    Rogers said he bought shares related to tourism and education, which ``in China will continue to be a major industry.'' Other investments include those of airlines, water companies and agricultural producers, he said.

    ``China has a huge agricultural problem,'' Rogers said. The ``government is doing everything it can to revive the agriculture industry.''

    Yuan to Climb

    Rogers was bullish on the Chinese yuan, saying it could eventually rise to 2 yuan per dollar.
    ``Don't sell your renminbi, because it will go a lot higher in the next 20 years,'' Rogers said.
    The yuan has gained more than 4 percent against the dollar this year, after climbing 7 percent in 2007. The currency traded at 7.01 to the dollar April 25.

    Rogers traveled the world by motorcycle and car in the 1990s, researching investment ideas for his books, which include ``Adventure Capitalist'' and ``Hot Commodities.''

How now my dearest MooMooCow?

Would you be as bullish as Mr.Rogers is on the Chinese Stock Markets?

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Chinese Stock Markets: The Day They Jumped!

Published on Seattle Times. Chinese get a taste of investing's downside

  • SHANGHAI, China — When emergency workers found Wang sprawled unconscious after having downed two bags of insecticide, he was still clutching the PDA he had been using to check stock prices.

    Like a number of other small investors in China, Wang had bet — and lost — his life savings, about $15,000, on the Chinese stock market. The propaganda office and doctors at the hospital where he was treated said the 36-year-old factory worker had been preparing to get married and that he had hoped to use the money to buy an apartment for his fiancée.

    Wang's attempted suicide and those of other investors are a heartbreaking consequence of China's great experiment in capitalism.

    In February, Li, a 25-year-old engineer, jumped from the seventh floor of the building where he worked in the city of Chengdu. His company said he had lost a huge amount on the stock market. On March 30, a 39-year-old former ice-cream- shop owner, also named Li, leaped to his death from his apartment building in the inland province of Shandong after losing a third of the $4,500 he had invested.

    As China's stock markets crashed over the past six months, the Communist government reacted in a way most consumer investors like Wang did not anticipate: It watched from the sidelines. It wasn't until last week, after the Shanghai benchmark index's fall to a symbolic milestone, below 50 percent of its peak in October, that Beijing finally stepped in.

    Its announcements that it would slash a tax on stock transactions and control volatility by requiring some big block trades to take place off the regular stock market, pushed the market up 14 percent. It has fallen again since then, however.

    But given that the Chinese government has the power and money to do much more, some say the fact that its help arrived so late and is so limited means it is sending a message to shareholders that they should no longer expect a government bailout in such situations.

    The former shop owner's sister, Li Chunyan, 34, said she understands that those who lost everything have only themselves to blame for risking so much. But because the stock market is "damaging common people's lives this much, there should be policies" to help them. She said even the U.S. government is doing more to help its investors: "I heard about the U.S. lowering interest rates to save the market," she said. "Well, different countries are different."

    In online bulletin-board postings, small-time retail investors — who, unlike in U.S. markets, make up the vast majority of those who hold money in China's exchanges — have vented their anger at the government. "China's stock market is piled up with investors' tears and blood," wrote one shareholder.

    Institutional investors, fund managers and analysts who follow the Chinese stock markets are less sympathetic, saying that the suffering of consumers who lost money is a necessary step on the road to capitalism.

    "You lose money, you jump out the window, too bad. It's your problem," said Vincent Chan, head of China research for Credit Suisse. "For any market to grow, this is something the government should realize: At the end of the day, it's the investors who bear the responsibility of the investment, not other people."

    The nose-dive of the Shanghai stock market and its sister exchange in the southern city of Shenzhen has been humbling for Chinese investors who had once believed the only direction share prices could go was up.

    Analysts say they were overdue for a correction. Despite weak earnings by many companies and rampant corruption, the Shanghai composite index quadrupled in value from 2002 to 2007.

    Briefly in November, PetroChina became the world's first $1 trillion company by some measures of its market value. But by the end of April, shares of PetroChina had plummeted to below its IPO price for the first time.

    Andy Xie, a former chief economist for Morgan Stanley Asia Pacific and now an independent analyst, said the challenge for the Chinese public is that "generally speaking, retail investors bought stocks at a high point. They listened to their relatives, friends and heard propaganda.

    "When the stocks fall, they are unwilling to sell off and they sit there waiting for the government to save the markets," he said. "This is not rational."

    Psychologists across the country say that in recent months they have seen more patients seeking treatment for addiction to gambling.

    Some investors like Ma Guocheng, 26 and an office worker, say they have learned their lessons from the recent stock-market plunge. In April and May 2007, Ma invested some 270,000 yuan — about $38,600 at today's exchange rate — in stocks. By November, those shares were valued at 440,000. He thought about selling, but then he thought they would climb even higher. Now his holdings are worth 50,000, about $7,000.

    "I was greedy," Ma admitted. As a consequence, "I lost more than 80 percent of my total investment."

OMIGOD!

  • "You lose money, you jump out the window, too bad. It's your problem," said Vincent Chan, head of China research for Credit Suisse.

That's being so nasty man!


Thursday, October 25, 2007

Buffett's China trip

Here is the video clip posted on CNBC website: http://www.cnbc.com/id/21435354?__source=RSS*blog*&par=RSS.

And where is the clip of Buffett and Jack: http://www.cnbc.com/id/21450915 and this page contains the written transcript: http://www.cnbc.com/id/21453020/site/14081545/

Regarding the Chinese markets:

  • Carl: You're quoted this morning as saying the China market is still, I'm thinking, your words, 'too hot.' Too hot to buy, you need to keep looking.

    Warren: No, I, I, just said that we very seldom buy into a market that's gone up a whole lot, and I don't know anything real specific about the Chinese market or Chinese stocks. But I do know that when prices have gone up a whole lot then I'm more skeptical when they've gone down a whole lot. I really like the look of markets that have gone down rather than markets that have gone up. But I will say this, what I've seen in China just today, in terms of the industrial development in Dalian, is making a believer in me, certainly in the economy, but that doesn't mean that I think the stocks are attractive.
Enjoy!

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

And how about China Again?

Here is a fantastic article written by David Webb on the Chinese stock market.

  • What else can you call a US$3.2tn market which has gained 358% in 20 months and trades on a historic P/E of over 60, which is probably closer to 80-100 excluding stock-market and real-estate revaluations from "E". We look at the bubble, the impact on HK, the thru-train, the calls in HK for an A-H arbitrage mechanism, and how the bursting may affect the socio-political system. The absence of a free media is itself contributing to the bubble.

Do give it a read: http://webb-site.com/articles/incredibubble.htm

  • By definition, bubbles are markets whose valuations are unsupported by fundamentals. There is nothing to fall back on. Bubbles never just plateau and go sideways - because that would not satisfy investors who bought in expectation of continued rapid gains. As soon as the momentum runs out, those investors head for the exit, and with nobody willing to take their place, the market crashes, usually overshooting fundamental value on the downside. Just a return to the index level of 20 months ago, when valuations of some stocks were beginning to look reasonable, would be a drop of 78%.

    Like avalanches and other non-linear phenomena, nobody can exactly predict when a bubble will burst. All they can do is look at the accumulating snow on the mountain, and decide that it is not a good time to go skiing. By staying indoors, they might miss out on some great skiing, but they can be certain of avoiding burial in an avalanche.

Thursday, June 07, 2007

The Gambling Culture In China And Suggestions for its Market

Mr. Hugh Young, the Managing Director of Aaberdeedn Asset Management Asia, has a nice piece published on FT.ocm titled, Gambling culture fuelling China’s market

The following suggestion made by Mr. Young on how China could improve its market is certainly extremly interesting.

  • In terms of economic controls, the obvious thing to do would be to raise the cost of borrowing, but this would have ramifications across the economy, attracting further speculative inflows and putting more upward pressure on the currency. The suspicion is that Beijing doesn’t want to see its retail investors shouldering large losses if its actions caused the market to plunge.

    Perhaps the Chinese government should look to increase supply by having more initial public offerings of state businesses. One option is to accelerate the listing of H shares (Hong Kong Stock Exchange) on the A share (Shanghai stock exchange) market, which would mop up some liquidity (and improve the standard of listed companies on the mainland). But right now the government is more interested in encouraging flows the other way. It has reduced barriers to domestic investors investing overseas, which is sensible, but investors are disinclined to diversify when they think returns will be better in their own market.

    Whether the government takes radical action and succeeds in cooling the stock market, or whether it ends in tears for local investors, the impact on the wider economy, as with Taiwan, may be limited. There has been a flurry of IPOs but many businesses and industries are still state-owned, somewhat immune from fluctuations in bourses. Furthermore the government has the saving reserves to invest if capital from the stock market dries up. Depending on the degree of the fall, economic growth may slow – no bad thing, as it would ease the inflationary pressures in some parts of the economy.

    We would welcome a slowdown in China’s stock market and economic growth as we have been concerned for some time about the rate of its rapid expansion. However, it is unlikely to prompt us to change our strategy on capitalising on China’s undoubted potential. As long-time (and long-term) investors in China, we’ve always been more comfortable investing via Hong Kong, including H shares. In general, companies there are of better quality and better regulated than on the mainland. (That said, at least we are now seeing profit margin improvement on the mainland and real earnings growth.) So they provide a more prudent way of gaining exposure to China’s growth.

    It’s worth highlighting that the mainland exchanges are in effect off limits. (China is still largely a closed economy for investment purposes.) We are disinterested observers, because we do not have any holdings there. That will change in time as market access and company fundamentals improve. But there’s no screaming urgency for us to plunge into the mainland while we see better quality at its edges.

Friday, May 25, 2007

Second biggest Bubble?

My Dearest Moo Moo Cow,

I noted that FSO has a new market commentator and Mr. Gary Dorsch decides to do an editorial on the current hottest topic in the financial world, Greenspan on China:

Guru Greenspan Turns Bearish on Shanghai Red-Chips

  • Guru Greenspan is now predicting that the world’s second biggest bubble, the Shanghai Red-chip stock market is about to deflate in a very big way. “It is clearly unsustainable. There’s going to be a dramatic contraction at some point,” adding that a market correction could also cause problems for Chinese personal wealth. The Shanghai Red-chip market soared 130% in the past year, hitting an all-time high of 4,205 on May 24th, and is up 56% so far in 2007.

Music Video On The Chinese Stock Market

My Dearest TK,

Many thanks for your link to the music video on the Chinese Stock Market!

http://www.tudou.com/v/_J5S3lNeb1s

Hope that everyone else enjoys the video!

regards

Friday, May 18, 2007

Investing In China

My Dearest Moo Moo Cow,

I just came across this news article from Associated Press posted on Yahoo!. (
1st-time investors buy up Chinese stocks )

Some of interesting comments were made.

1. watching Chinese stock prices gallop upward for months, Ding Xiurui wanted a piece of the action. The 45-year-old office worker stood in line at a bustling brokerage Friday to open her first trading account. She brought her sister, who opened an account too. They joined millions of other novice investors who are jumping into a market that has soared to dizzying heights, with prices up nearly 50 percent this year.

"We still can make money," Ding said as she stood at the counter at Tiantong Securities with the paperwork for her new account. Asked what stocks she would buy, Ding said, "I don't know. I'm still learning."

2. Economists say the government should take steps to moderate the price surge or risk a sharp fall that could hurt millions of small investors.
"This is a very critical time. If policy adjustments take place now, the market can still have a sustainable development," said Hong Liang, a Goldman Sachs economist. "The longer they wait, the harder the eventual landing will be."


3. Enthusiasm for stocks is fueled in part by a lack of other investments in a heavily regulated economy. Famously frugal Chinese families save up to 40 percent of their incomes, but bank accounts pay just 3 percent interest — less than the rate of inflation.

4. "I have a stable income but in China now a stable income doesn't mean a good life," said a 26-year-old government employee who was opening an account at Tiantong Securities and would identify himself only by the English name Leon. "Seeing other people earning a lot of money, all you can think is, you're earning so little and how can you make more?"

5. A 60-year-old cleaning woman in the southwestern city of Chongqing is being feted in the media as a market wizard after doubling her 20,000 yuan ($2,600) investment in two months.
"At a time like this, who can lose money?" the newspaper Chongqing Morning Post quoted her as saying.


6. The Beijing Youth Daily carried a photo of a Buddhist monk opening a trading account last week at a brokerage in the western city of Xi'an.
In Nanjing in the east, a man in his 70s mortgaged his apartment to raise 60,000 yuan ($7,800) to play the market, the Web site Shenzhen News Net reported.


7. "It might be dangerous, but who knows? People thought it was dangerous in March," Leon said

8. Stock prices are 30 to 40 times earnings, an unusually high ratio for many major markets, which some say makes them unrealistic. "But that is not paying attention to earnings growth, which is very, very strong," Liang said.

9. "We hear that before 2008, the government won't let prices fall," said Ding's sister, Ding Jingxian. "We're not afraid."

And the most interesting point in my opinion is number 10.

10. "We are opening 40 to 50 new accounts a day," said Zhang Jun, the branch's deputy manager. "Six months ago, it was four to five a day." Nationwide, the number of trading accounts has soared by 30 percent over the past year to 95 million, one-sixth of them opened in the past four months, according to the China Securities Depository and Clearing Corp., which is owned by China's two stock exchanges.
On Wednesday alone, investors opened 552,559 new accounts, the company said.


WOW!

95 million trading accounts.

Yes, it does sound massive ... but ... so is the China's population.

I wonder.. if just one quarter of China population were to open a trading account and buy some shares.. I wonder ... the impact on the market.

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

On Shanghai Again

My Dearest Moo Moo Cow,

Everyone is talking about Shanghai again and FSO Market Commentator, Mr.Frank Barbera, has made some brief comments on his write-up today,
A Little Bit of This, A Little Bit of That...


  • Yet, as we noted last week, the Shanghai Stock Exchange looks dangerously unstable, and in my view, that is a key market to be watching as the volatility there continues to increase, with prices tumbling last night by nearly 4%. Again, it is very possible that the Shanghai Market may continue to move higher still, expanding its parabolic arc to the 4,500 level, but if that is to happen, it will happen soon as the parabolic bust is now knocking on the proverbial door -- with mid-to-late June a prime candidate.


    Above: The long term weekly chart of the Shanghai Composite…perhaps a few more weeks, then POW! Right in the kisser. Expecting a 30% sell off in Shanghai early this summer; it will not be pretty and it will likely not go unnoticed by other markets.


Fellow blogger Sal, has made some interesting posting too.

Friday, April 20, 2007

How now my dearest Moo Moo Cow?

My Dearest Moo Moo Cow,

Some interesting stuff around, eh? Firstly, your
Shanghai 180 posting was rather interesting given what happened yesterday with the Chinese market falling some -4.5% and at one point the market was down as much as 7% and this dragged the Asian markets down with the concern focued mainly on China rate fears. But is the rates fear just the issue? Or is it the case of an extremely high Shanghai 180 market?

Some interesting commentary taken from the
following news article.

  • However, analysts warned that the price levels were unsustainable and the market could be approaching another correction.

    "This is definitely a bubble in the making - for most stocks, positive earnings growth has been priced in until 2009," said Steven Sun, HSBC equities analyst. "At the height of the last bubble [2000-01], we saw investors opening 2m accounts a month, which is half the current rate."

    "Any money getting into the market now is not smart money and is coming from the kind of people who can least afford to lose it," said Fraser Howie, author of a book on the Chinese stock markets. "That has to have the government worried about social stability."

    The rush to join the Chinese stock-buying frenzy comes after the market rose more than 130 per cent last year and a further 40 per cent so far this year.

    The benchmark Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.01 per cent on Wednesday to another record high.

    Retail investors began returning to the stock market in large numbers in May, following a five-year bear market. The figures for new accounts are considered a rough proxy for new retail investors entering the market, although there have been cases in the past where individual traders have opened thousands of accounts using fake identifications. There is also an element of double-counting in the figures as many investors open accounts in both Shanghai and Shenzhen.

    Even as retail investors continue to pile in to the market, foreign investors have grown cautious. One international fund manager said he now had more of his Chinese assets in cash than at any time since the government allowed foreigners access to domestic stocks.

    Before the February correction, the government had tried to cool market sentiment, publishing prominent editorials warning of the risks. However, since then, it has been quiet, leading many to assume there is tacit approval of the ongoing bull run.

    "We expect the government to come out with more measures to cool the market soon," said Jing Ulrich, JPMorgan chairman of China equities.

Some real concerns?

And then there is the commodity guru, Jim Rogers. He has another news article out. But first, I had posted a posting on his views back in March; And what about Jim Rogers Views?. Now I want to bring out this article again because he had an interesting comment.

  • But he added: "China is one of the few countries in the world where I'm willing to sit out a 30-40 percent decline."

That's mighty interesting cause if the 30-40% percent decline were to happen, what about the chain-effects caused? Would want consider it as a correction? Or would one consider it as a crash?

Anyway, on March 29th, Mr. Rogers has another news article, Commodity guru Rogers says not selling China shares.

Some interesting comments from that news clip:

  • HONG KONG, March 29 (Reuters) - Commodities and investment guru Jim Rogers said on Thursday he was holding on to his Chinese shares, even though the market is pricey and a bubble may be developing.

    "I own Chinese shares. I'm not selling Chinese shares. If the Chinese stock market doubles again this year I'll have to sell, because then it's a full-fledged bubble," he told a media briefing after a speech in Hong Kong.

    "If it goes down 50 percent this year I will buy a lot more Chinese shares. I'm not smart enough to know what it's going to do, but I'm not selling China at all."

    "There's no question that PEs (price to earnings ratios) in China in the A-share market are too high for some companies, but that doesn't mean it can't get much worse. When you have a bubble develop, crazy things happen," he said.

    "The Chinese stock market could double this year, even though it's expensive right now."

So how my dearest Moo Moo Cow? What do you think of his bullish veiws on the Chinese markets?

Moving on, just in case you do no notice but there's the extreme weakness in the US Dollar. ( click here for one of the many articles around).

Last but not least, Mr. Marty Chenard, who wrote that Shanghai 180, article has posted another update and you can read it here.

rgds

Friday, April 13, 2007

Shanghai Calling Again

My Dearest Moo Moo Cow,

I have noted that you had blogged on the following postiing called Shanghai 180 yesterday. So I was most interested when I noted the following editorial on FSO called The Great Unkowns.

Here is what Yiannis G. Mostrous, author of the Growth Engines is saying...

  • The world’s markets are still in bull mode, with the majority of investors trying to capture this new leg up. As a Hong Kong-based investor told me recently during a phone conversation, “It feels like the correction never took place.”

    The reference was in regard to the 9 percent one-day drop in the Chinese stock market on February 27--the largest selloff in 10 years.

    Nevertheless, the Chinese market is vulnerable to a new decline in the not-so-distant future. The drop could be as big as 20 percent, and markets around the world would take notice again. Although the trigger could be almost anything (there was no real news that led to the previous selloff), the main reason is this market’s extremely high valuations.

    Based on reliable information, retail investors in China have been eager to play the market. Although this isn’t a bad indicator on its own, the problem is that there’s early evidence that money is flowing through mortgages and credit card loans into the stock market.

    The Chinese are known to be great momentum players, but practices of that sort have proved harmful before and will be again this time around. The timing, of course, is another issue...

Good comments posted in my opinion. And Mr. Mostrous reminds that..

  • Volatility doesn’t mean bear market, and that can be a welcome, healthy change.

Now the issue is this...

If say or rather let's ass-u-me that another correction is possible in the Shanghai 180. The simple reasoning is that this market is at extremely dizzy heights at this moment of time. And even if one ass-u-me that the uptrend is still intact, I wonder what is the impact on the global market if Shanghai 180 does correct? Remember no markets goes up forever and ever, yes? Would Shanghai 180 do an orchestrated slow correction? Or would we see another drastic correction? And if it does happen, what is the impact on the global markets?

How?

Do you think this is an issue? Or do you think this is a non-issue?

rgds