Thursday, November 06, 2008

How Now? Is It Over For The Bear Market Or Should We Expect Worse?!

Posted on the UK Independent

  • Bear market has ended, says Morgan Stanley
    By Mathieu Robbins
    Wednesday, 5 November 2008

    Analysts at the US investment bank Morgan Stanley are recommending that clients start to buy shares again after more than a year of falling markets. In an investment strategy report, analysts at the bank said that all four indicators they use to gauge the equity market outlook have started to indicate a turn in the downward trend.

    "We have now come full circle: our market timing indicators are giving us a full house buy signal," said the statement. "
    Each of the four indicators – valuation, capitulation, risk, fundamentals – tells us to buy."

    The report said that the catalyst for the change in outlook was that the last few investor groups – retail investors, sell-side analysts and purchasing managers – have "capitulated" to bear market sentiment. "
    The idea is that when these three groups know about the bad news, equity prices are probably already reflecting it," it read.

    The note recommends that investors keep shares in their investment portfolios to take in the expected growth.

    It comes after months of stock market falls that have seen London's FTSE 100 index lose about a third of its value in the last year. However, even the report's compilers admit that while they consider it to have a "near-perfect" track record, there is a chance it is wrong.

    "These models tend to work some 80 to 90 per cent of the time," they said. "And in the 10 to 20 per cent that they don't work, the move the other way can be spectacular."

However, them folks at Fitch Ratings are saying otherwise!

  • Expect ‘severe’ world economic downturn next year, Fitch says

    Less spending by U.S. consumers will lead to the most significant decline in global economic growth since World War II

    By Mark Bruno
    November 4, 2008 2:20 PM ET

    Global economic conditions have gone from bad to worse in a hurry, prompting analysts at Fitch Ratings to predict a “severe” global recession will consume the world’s most developed economies next year.

    In a report released today, Fitch analysts estimated that the United States, Europe and Japan will see a contraction of 0.8% in their combined gross domestic product in 2009, in contrast to estimated GDP growth of 1.1% for 2008. That would register as the most significant decline in global economic growth since World War II.

    It appears the U.S. economy may be the most severely impacted, igniting an “unusually synchronized downturn” next year. Fitch predicts U.S. GDP will decline by 1.2% next year, in contrast to its 1.4% growth in 2008 and 2% gain in 2007.

    With the credit crisis intensifying greatly in the last two months, consumer confidence has declined to all-time lows, and Fitch expects that will translate into a 1.6% decline in consumer spending next year. Fitch noted that U.S. consumers have been the “predominant sources of global demand” over the last several years and have driven major economic growth in both developed and emerging market nations.

    At the same time, the confidence of corporations in the U.S has eroded significantly over the last two months. Many companies are now investing less in their businesses, a trend that will likely continue well into 2009 because banks have tightened their lending standards, making it more difficult for companies to access credit.

    Companies invested 5% less in their businesses in the third quarter than they did in the second quarter, Fitch pointed out, and its analysts predict that overall business investment will drop by 6% next year. In 2007, companies increased investments in their businesses by 5% over the previous year.

    Fitch also expects the unemployment rate in the U.S to hit 7.8% next year and 8.3% in 2010, up from its current level of 6%. The rise in joblessness will contribute to, and perhaps prolong, the global economic downturn, with Fitch analysts suggesting that signs of recovery may not appear until 2010. But the analysts conceded that it is almost impossible to tell when the downturn might let up.

    “Recession driven by a contraction in the supply of credit is uncharted territory for the world economy, and there are few historical parallels on which to gauge its possible depth or length,” wrote the London-based team of Fitch analysts. “The process of deleveraging by households and companies is now underway and this will weigh on spending for some time.”

On FinancialSense.com, market commentator wrote about the the failing pillars of the strengths in the stock market and economy in his editorial, And Then There Were None

  • ... One by one the supposed pillars of strength to the stock market and economy are falling, along with it many widely held assumptions. We were exposed to many beliefs in 2007 as to why the stock market and economy would hold up as risks were downplayed and bullish theories were held as infallible truths. Below are some of the most widely held assumptions that have since proven overly optimistic... do read rest of his article here

Lastly here are some comments from CNBC's Bob Pisani on what has happened.

  • Those of you who thought the "Obama bounce" would triumph over "the economy" or "profit taking" today must be rather unhappy.

    The average stock is down about 2.5 percent midday, with particularly weakness in some commodity and energy names. ArcelorMittal's announcement they would be cutting steel production is weighing on steel, iron ore, and coal companies.

    But it doesn't stop there: financials and pharma have been weak, and recently tech stocks have also moved down. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, not surprisingly, threw her support behind an economic stimulus bill midday as well.

    Stocks have had a nice run in the past 7 trading days—the S&P is up about 15 percent from its lows last week. Many beaten up groups like REITs, retail, restaurants and hotels have had nice moves up.

    What the market is saying here is, not so fast. There is a ceiling on a market rally due to the horrible economic numbers. Most traders believe it is highly unlikely the S&P will close the year out near 1,200. The majority think we are likely to be slightly higher from current levels.

    As for the Obama bounce: most stocks that were supposed to benefit from his election (solar, hospitals, infrastructure) are also down today, in many cases just as much as stocks that were supposed to be hurt by his election (defense, pharma, big oil, tobacco). ( source:
    http://www.cnbc.com/id/27557316 )


Wednesday, November 05, 2008

News On Titan Chemicals Earnings Performance

What good is sales without profit?

What good is talking about sales revenue growth when your profits are declining?
These are rather elementary issues, yes?

It was a shocker to read the following article:
Titan 9-month revenue up 32pc

Yes, boldly highlighted was Titan 9-month revenue up 32pc and that what was even more amazing that they even have a huge colored chart of Titan Chemical's sales revenue performance!


And how did Titan actually performed? Rather shockingly poor! It's a stinker!

A net profit of only 9.671 million!!!!!!!!!!! Last year same period, it made 74.710 million.

And the previous quarter, Titan made over 116 million!!!!!!! ( See Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 30/6/2008 )

Hence Titan's earnings last night was TERRIBLY POOR!

On Star Biz, Titan third quarter net profit drops on inventory write-down

  • Titan third quarter net profit drops on inventory write-down

    PETALING JAYA:
    Titan Chemicals Corp Bhd’s net profit shrunk to RM9.67mil for the third quarter ended Sept 30 against RM74.7mil in the previous corresponding period.

    The drop was attributed to inventory write-down of RM124.7mil by the company on falling feedstock and end-product prices during the quarter under review.

    “With limited visibility on global economic growth and wavering levels of business confidence, industry producers and downstream manufacturers were understandably more cautious and conservative.

    “Hence demand weakened and prices fell between July and September,’’ managing director Warren Wilder said in a statement yesterday. Turnover for Q3 increased to RM2.05bil from RM1.56bil, as higher sales prices offset lower sales volume.

Which is why I cannot comprehend what Business Times is writing here: Titan 9-month revenue up 32pc. Here is the article in full.

  • Titan 9-month revenue up 32pc

    By Sharen KaurPublished: 2008/11/05

    Titan Chemicals Corp Bhd (5103) reported a 32 per cent surge in revenue to RM5.8 billion for the nine months to September 30 2008 on higher average selling prices.

    The net profit of Malaysia's biggest petrochemical firm, however, slid 26 per cent to RM216.5 million, largely because of lower earnings in the third quarter.

    Third quarter net profit fell 92 per cent to RM9.9 million from RM119.2 million in the same period last year.


    This was attributed to margin squeeze and writedown of inventories to net realisable value amounting to RM124.7 million in the third quarter, caused by plunging prices of oil and its derivatives, including feedstock and end-products.

    Titan, which makes olefins and polyolefins for the plastics industry and uses naphtha - a petroleum by-product - as raw material, said the average industry weekly prices for naphtha and polymers had moved downwards as global economic uncertainties seeped in.
    In a statement yesterday, the main board-listed firm said that group sales in the third quarter declined two per cent to RM2 billion from RM2.1 billion in the preceding quarter.

    "The global business environment has turned very challenging. With limited visibility on global economic growth and wavering levels of business confidence, industry products and downstream manufacturers were understandably more cautious and conservative. Hence, demand weakened and prices fell between July and September," Titan managing director Warren Wilder said.

    Titan said that demand for polymer products in the last quarter of 2008 was expected to be affected by the possible global recession, but believed the impact would be partially mitigated by the seasonal demand towards the end of the year.

    "Our diversification into higher manufacturing capacity for polypropylene production is part of our long-term strategy in product positioning," Wilder said.

    Titan has completed a plan to solve the bottleneck at its polypropylene plant, enabling it to increase production significantly.

Don't you think the article head line of Titan's revenue being up 32% is rather so misleading?

And do have a look at this past blog posting: Titan VIII


Tuesday, November 04, 2008

More Dry Bulk Update

More update on the dry bulk sector.

Posted on Reuters:

  • India dry bulk shippers brace for rough sail ahead

    By Swati Pandey

    MUMBAI (Reuters) - Dry bulk shippers in India are scrambling to put their vessels on long-term contracts and defer new orders on fears a slump in charter hire rates will bite into their earnings this year and beyond, officials said.

    The Baltic Dry Index, a gauge of shipping costs for commodities, has fallen more than 90 percent to a little over 800 points from a peak of 11,793 points in May.

    Several dry bulk carriers have been sitting idle for days as poor demand has taken a toll on shipments, which have fallen over 90 percent from a year ago, analysts said.

    "The scenario is a lot more painful as far as dry bulk is concerned. There is a significant impairment on earnings,"
    Bharat Sheth, Managing Director of Great Eastern Shipping, which has 11 bulk carriers, said on a conference call last week.

    Officials were also concerned about renewal of contracts, as there were no takers for long-term covers and rates were abysmally low.

    Average earnings on vessels in the spot market are seen falling by 70-90 percent, Sheth said, adding he would immediately shift spot vessels to term contracts if the pricing was suitable.

    On the contrary, offshore and oil tanker segments were still healthy, though rates have softened by nearly half since the peaks seen early this year.

    Firms that placed orders for dry bulk vessels over recent months, when freight rates were climbing steadily,
    have now deferred them as the sector does not look lucrative anymore.

    A dry bulk carrier moves unpackaged cargo such as grain, coal, ore and cement, demand for which has significantly dropped due to a global economic slowdown and tighter trade finance.

    However, Essar Shipping Port & Logistics was largely insulated from the slump, a top official said, as 80 percent of its bulk carriers were on long-term contracts. Still, it has deferred acquisitions due to poor market conditions.

    The company had planned to buy three carriers this year.

    "Because of demand getting shrunk and new supplies (vessels) getting in, the dry bulk trade is declining. Throughput itself has shrunk considerably," said Divyanshu Tambe, analyst at I-maritime Consultancy.

    Throughput is a measure of the number of vessels or containers handled by a port over a period of time.


    ROUGH SEAS AHEAD

    Analysts widely expect profits at dry bulk shippers to slip significantly in FY09 and the year after, while those that have not secured firm contracts may even turn in losses.

    Dry bulk segment comprise an average 25 percent of shipping companies' revenues.

    Most shippers posted a spectacular jump in quarterly profits for July-September, buoyed by strong charter hire rates in earlier quarters and income from new vessels.

    "What we saw - quarter two - will be the best quarter in terms of numbers for years to come. In the coming quarter, Mercator Lines will take the biggest hit in profit, followed by SCI," a Mumbai-based analyst said.

    Mercator Lines owns and controls 12 dry bulk carriers while state-run Shipping Corp of India has 20.

    "At least 1-½ years from now on... till FY10 will be bad for these companies. It will be a while before we come out of it," I-maritime's Tambe said.

Issues to consider.

1. Several dry bulk carriers have been sitting idle for days as poor demand...

2. .. no takers for long-term covers and rates were abysmally low

3. .. offshore and oil tanker segments were still healthy

4. Firms that placed orders for dry bulk vessels over recent months.. have now deferred them as the sector does not look lucrative anymore. - this is a massive, massive concern for dry bulk vessel builders, yes?

5. Analysts widely expect profits at dry bulk shippers to slip significantly in FY09 and the year after, while those that have not secured firm contracts may even turn in losses. - expect losses!

And the following article on FT.com highlights the potential massive losses due to derivatives! Yes it would appear that even shippers uses derivatives!

  • Wave of losses looms for shipping industry

    By Robert Wright in London

    Published: November 4 2008 02:00 Last updated: November 4 2008 02:00

    Fears are growing in the shipping industry over the potentially big losses that could emerge this week on derivatives triggered by the October collapse in rates to charter dry bulk ships.

    Since short-term dry bulk charter rates plunged 71.9 per cent in October, traders and shipowners have worried that traders might be caught out by the speed and severity of the fall.

    Traders in forward freight agreements - derivatives based on short-term charter rates - could owe significant sums if they were betting on a rise in charter rates for ships carrying coal, iron ore and other commodities.

    The sector's Baltic Dry index of charter rates started the month at 3,025 points and closed on Friday at 851. The 80 per cent of trades made through clearing houses were being settled yesterday, while traders who bought cash-settled products through private transactions, known as over-the-counter trades, have until Friday to settle.

    The many shipowners participating in FFA markets could also face losses if their market positions went beyond simply covering the market exposure of their actual ships.

    London-based, New York-listed Britannia Bulk, which has been hit by its exposure to speculative FFA trading, put its British operating subsidiary into administration on Friday. It is the first quoted shipping company to suffer such a blow during the current downturn.

    Duncan Dunn, senior director in the futures division of London's Simpson, Spence & Young shipbrokers, said the market's very rapid fall would have left anyone betting on upward movements needing to make substantial payments. "If they're under strain, then that's only going to increase their problems," he said.

    Market participants' concerns have been heightened by the possibility of knock-on effects from failures of investors affected by FFA market losses.

    If investors facing FFA market losses hand back ships they had chartered early to owners, the ships' owners will earn considerably less than they expected.
    They could face problems servicing debt related to the ships.

    Michael Bodouroglou, chief executive of Paragon Shipping, a Nasdaq-listed dry bulk shipowner, said that, even if a company had not participated in FFA trading itself, counterparties such as ship charterers might have done so. "Company failures may cause a domino effect," he said.

However, there is is one optimistic dry bulk shipper!

CEO: Don't Dump DryShips

  • There are rough waters ahead for shippers, but DryShips is looking for opportunities and George Economou, the company's controversial chief executive, is confident he will weather the storm.

    On Monday the company posted a 71% spike in third-quarter profit, boosted by increased freight rates, though its earnings missed analysts’ expectations.

    Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Natasha Boyden said the company fell short of the Street’s forecasts primarily because of increased general and administrative expenses of $25.9 million, higher than her estimate of $10.5 million. Its operating expenses for its ocean drilling rig unit was $40.9 million, versus Boyden’s forecast of $27.6 million.

    Given the uncertainty in demand, Boyden is concerned over DryShips' substantial spot market exposure for 2009, which Boyden estimates at 41.0% of its vessel days.

    Nonetheless, Economou’s optimism rubbed off on investors, who sent the company's stock soaring 14.0%, or $2.69, to close at $21.94. DryShips shares have tumbled 71.8% since the beginning of the year. Greek shipping billionaire Economou has been criticized for running DryShips, a pubic company, as if it was private.

    The global credit crunch has punished the shipping industry, with virtually no vessels on spot charters moving. That's a sign that the frozen credit markets and worries about economic growth have stifled commercial activity.

    But Economou said he expects the situation to improve as commodity stockpiles are drawn down and financing thaws out. Meanwhile, the credit crisis has delayed delivery of new freighters, since buyers can no longer get financing, and that benefits DryShips, which, Economou said, has a large enough fleet to keep up with reviving demand. DryShips announced last month it plans to take over 9 Cape-size ships that had been owned by Economou’s privately held Cardiff Marine.

    Economou said DryShips is also strong financially, with cash of $456 million and another $1.2 billion of available capital from bank lines, for total liquidity of $1.6 billion. But DryShips has the most outstanding debt in the sector and its total debt has shot up 131.3% over the prior year.

    DryShips patted itself on the back on Monday for shifting its chartering strategy prior to the recent bloodletting in the dry-bulk industry. During the second and third quarters, when the freight rates were at all-time highs, DryShips upped its long-term charters to more than half its business. That had the effect of locking in rates for an average of five years.

    On Monday the Baltic Dry Index, which is managed by the Baltic Exchange in London and measures dry bulk shipping rates on 40 routes across the world, fell for the 21 st straight session, slipping 24 points, to 847. Freight rates on Capesize ships, the mega-carriers that can't fit through canals, declined 4.4%, to $5,716, down from $5,982, on Sunday, and 28.9% lower than the prior week. The Baltic index has been hit by worries over tumbling steel prices, the global credit crunch, a slowdown in the world economy and declining demand for commodities.

    On Monday, DryShips reported that its third-quarter net income jumped to $179.98 million, or $4.21 per share, up from $105.28 million, or $2.97 per share, in the prior year. This included a capital gain on the sale of two vessels of $65.8 million or $1.54 per share and a noncash loss of $36.8 million, or 86 cents per share, associated with the valuation of interest-rate swaps.

    Excluding these items, net income was $151.0 million or $3.53 per share, below analysts’ expectations of $3.60 per share for the quarter.

    Revenue jumped to $329.0 million, up from $150.0 million last year, beating analysts’ estimate of $306.0 million.

    Meanwhile, the company's Ocean Rig unit, an ultra deep-water drilling operator, contributed $89.0 million to DryShips' bottom line.

    DryShips said the spin-off of the ultra deep-water driller will occur on schedule; the new entity will be named Ocean Rig UDW.

    Day rates for ultra-deep water drilling remains very strong--the company said it recently struck a fixture between $640,000 and $650,000 a day for a term of five years.

Ahem!.. DRYS went soaring 14.0%, or $2.69, to close at $21.94????

WOW!

I remember DRYS. It was trading around 110 back in May 2008! And now it's 21.94??!!

Monday, November 03, 2008

Maybulk Is Cut To Underperform Target Price of 1.80

Saw the following note on Dow Jones News wire.

  • Credit Suisse downgrades Maybulk (5077.KU) to Underperform from Neutral, cuts target to MYR1.80 from MYR3.80; this after reducing Baltic Drybulk Index (BDI) FY08 forecast by 64% to 2500 and FY10 by 70% to 1500. As a result, cuts Maybulk net profit estimate by 15%-56%, dividends reduced in FY09 by 50% and FY10 by 73%, lowering yields to 5.9% in FY09 and 3.2% in FY10. Analyst Annuar Aziz also turns mildly cautious following company's proposed $221 million related party transaction to buy 22% stake in PACC Offshore Services as no future profitability disclosed. Shares +6% at MYR2.49.

Cuts target to only rm 1.80.

Justifiable? BDI at this moment of time is below 900.

Secondly, that PACC thingee. It's a related party transaction. RELATED.

And when no future profitability is disclosed, analyst Annuar Aziz does have a very strong point, a $221 million point, yes?

Do you like related party transactions?

I don't! I just cannot stand all this related party transactions!

Sunday, November 02, 2008

Mizuho's $7 Billion Urban Legends!

Here's yet another Urban Legend Story for all the wrong reasons!!

Mizuho $7 Billion Loss Turned on Toxic Aardvark Made in America

  • Oct. 29 (Bloomberg) -- Alexander Rekeda, a 34-year-old Ukrainian-born math whiz, turned in his BlackBerry and security card and sent an e-mail to his bosses at Calyon, the investment- banking unit of Credit Agricole SA. Then, along with ten colleagues from the New York structured-finance team, who fired off similar messages, he walked two blocks down the Avenue of the Americas to Mizuho Financial Group Inc.

    It was Dec. 8, 2006, and Rekeda's arrival was a coup for Mizuho, Japan's second-largest bank by revenue. A month earlier, it became the first Japanese lender to list on the New York Stock Exchange since 1989 -- a move hailed by John Thain, then chief executive officer of the bourse, as a sign that Mizuho was taking ``its place among the world's leading companies.''

    The hires would prove a costly blunder. Rekeda, who became head of structured credit in the Americas, and his team led Mizuho into a business it knew little about, securities backed by U.S. subprime mortgages, where it lost 672 billion yen ($7.1 billion), more than any bank in Asia. Most of the losses were related to defaults on collateralized debt obligations.

    Mizuho expects as much as 20 billion yen in potential further losses on bonds and bad loans related to bankrupt Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., company spokeswoman Masako Shiono said on Sept. 16. Moody's Investors Service, citing ``questions regarding the effectiveness of Mizuho's risk management and its risk appetite,'' continues to give the bank a negative outlook.

    ``Mizuho never made a penny out of subprime in the good times, they just got left holding the can in the bad,'' says David Threadgold, an analyst at Fox-Pitt Kelton Asia Ltd. in Tokyo who has an ``underperform'' rating on the stock. ``They made a very poor decision to launch into the packaging of subprime products at the end of 2006.''

    Toxic Assets

    How a Japanese bank that traces its roots to 1864 made such a bold entry into the U.S. subprime securities market, and almost choked on the toxic assets it created, is a tale of overreaching and poor timing. It also illustrates how financial technology made in the U.S. wreaked havoc on the other side of the globe.

    Many of the details are spelled out in a lawsuit Calyon filed against Mizuho in U.S. federal court seeking $750 million for ``covertly'' inducing its employees to quit. The case was settled out of court in September 2007 for an undisclosed amount. Shiono said Mizuho wouldn't comment for this article.

    Rekeda, who has a master's degree in mathematics from Kiev State University of Economics in Ukraine and an MBA from the University of Connecticut, had built Calyon's CDO business over two years. He closed six deals for the French bank in 2006, according to an affidavit in the case.

    Signing-On Fee

    All six, including two with the celestial names Cetus and Orion, later defaulted as Paris-based Credit Agricole racked up more than 6.5 billion euros ($8.1 billion) in subprime losses. Rekeda, now 34, declined to be interviewed.

    On Oct. 18, 2006, Rekeda and his team were offered an $11 million signing-on fee to defect to the Japanese bank, a Calyon lawyer said at a court hearing. Mizuho's plan to expand into the U.S. was hatched earlier that year, as Japanese lenders were recovering from a 14-year debt crisis that forced them to take $1.1 trillion in writedowns for bad loans.

    Mizuho, formed in 2000 in a merger of three banks, beat out rivals Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc. and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc. to win approval from U.S. regulators to set up a financial holding company. That enabled it to operate as a full-service investment bank.

    As Mizuho President Terunobu Maeda said at a press briefing on May 15 this year, the bank had excess capital and ``needed to study'' the U.S. mortgage-backed securities business.

    Bad Loans

    Maeda, 63, a former chairman of the Japanese Bankers Association and an amateur gardener who doesn't use air conditioners at his home during Tokyo's humid summers to make an environmental point, became president of Mizuho in April 2002. The bank recorded a loss of 2.38 trillion yen that fiscal year as it wrote off bad loans accrued during three recessions in a decade. Maeda returned it to profitability the next year after reducing non-performing assets and through gains on investments in Japanese stocks.

    While Mizuho was a newcomer to the CDO market in the U.S., it had experience arranging and selling similar investments in Japan and Europe. The company had ramped up its loan- securitization business, which Japanese banks were able to do without borrowers' consent after October 1998. Merrill Lynch & Co., Bear Stearns Cos. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. all helped Japanese banks repackage and market securities backed by corporate loans and mortgages.

    Rising Delinquencies

    Even so, Mizuho decided it needed help in the U.S. Talks with the Calyon team began in early 2006, when Douglas Munson, a sales director for the French bank, approached golfing buddy Theodore Ake, head of fixed income for Mizuho in New York, according to two people familiar with the negotiations. The size of the group and the amount of sign-on bonuses snowballed after Rekeda was brought into the discussion, the people said. Munson and Ake declined to comment.

    By the time the deal was consummated, the market was turning. On Dec. 11, 2006, the same day Mizuho announced it was setting up an office in the U.S. to create asset-backed debt securities, Fitch Ratings said the outlook for U.S. subprime mortgage bonds was ``negative.'' It expected delinquencies on those loans to rise by 50 percent.

    There was also confusion about the hiring deal. The Calyon team turned out to include more than the five people expected by Hitoshi Shimoyama, then deputy president of investment banking unit Mizuho Securities USA Inc., documents in the case allege.

    ``Mizuho did not even know the number or names of additional persons until shortly before they came,'' Shimoyama said in a March 17, 2007, affidavit.

    Bonus Pool

    Benjamin Lee, one of those who defected on Dec. 8, returned to the French bank five days later. He said he ``had been misled by Rekeda'' about the terms of employment at Mizuho, according to an affidavit he filed.

    Lee said he was initially told by Rekeda that he could expect $1 million to $1.5 million from a bonus pool. He later learned there was a separate contract for him and other junior members of the group that didn't include a revenue-related bonus. Senior team members were entitled to share as much as 25 percent of revenue from completed transactions, court documents said.

    Rekeda's group priced its first deal within 10 weeks, after the Mortgage Bankers Association reported that the default rate on U.S. subprime loans reached 12.6 percent, the highest level since the first quarter of 2003.

    Aardvark CDO

    The deal was named after a squat animal with a pig-like snout that feeds on ants and termites. Incorporated as a special- purpose company in the Cayman Islands, Aardvark ABS CDO was an ugly concoction: 31 percent of its $1.5 billion of securities were backed by subprime loans, 23 percent by residential mortgages repackaged from other CDO deals, and 33 percent by Alt- A mortgages, a category just above subprime. The remaining 13 percent were prime loans.

    One reason Rekeda was able to move so fast was that the deal had already been assembled by London-based Lloyds TSB Group Plc, which pulled out before completion, said three people familiar with the transaction. HarbourView Asset Management Corp., a unit of New York-based OppenheimerFunds Inc., stayed on as manager. Spokesmen for Lloyds and HarbourView declined to comment.

    Moody's assigned its highest short-term rating of P-1 to $1.3 billion of the Aardvark securities. In the prospectus, Mizuho pledged to back 87 percent of the deal, meaning that the bank, rather than investors, was on the hook for most of the potential losses.

    In the Pipeline

    A subsequent Mizuho offering, Tigris CDO 2007-1, valued at $902 million in March 2007, was backed by the lowest investment- grade tranches of CDO deals arranged by other Wall Street firms, including Merrill, Lehman and Citigroup Inc., according to a report that month by Fitch Ratings. More than 80 percent of the securities in the CDO had Fitch's lowest investment rating, BBB-, which is nine grades below AAA.

    Rekeda planned to bring at least nine more CDO deals to market within six months, the investment newsletter Asset-Backed Alert reported on May 11, 2007. The newsletter quoted him saying the bank had ``built up the pipeline.'' As of April 1, 2007, Mizuho Securities had amassed more than 550 billion yen in residential mortgage-backed securities and CDOs supported by home loans, according to the bank's financial statements.

    One of those deals made it to market in June 2007: a special-purpose entity called Delphinus 2007-1. Although named after a constellation, its contents were hardly stellar. Three- quarters of its securities were based on subprime mortgages, according to a July 23 Fitch report.

    Ratings Downgrade

    About 80 percent of the deal was backed by credit-default swaps arranged by firms including JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup and Wells Fargo & Co. Citing ``strong demand'' from investors, Mizuho increased the size of the deal that July to $1.6 billion from $1.2 billion.

    That was eight days before two Bear Stearns funds were shut down, heralding the start of the subprime crisis. Less than three months later, on Sept. 27, Fitch put Delphinus on its watch list. The negative designation, Fitch analyst Kevin Kendra said at the time, was ``probably the quickest I've seen'' on a CDO. In other words, Mizuho struggled to find buyers for its CDOs and, as their values plummeted, the bank would have to absorb the loss.

    Mizuho didn't tell investors about the extent of its exposure until November 2007, when it reported a 70 billion-yen loss on subprime-related securities in the first half ended Sept. 30. It also said it expected that figure to grow to 170 billion yen for the full year.

    CDO Default

    By December, Mizuho had halted its U.S. CDO business. It fired Rekeda and at least four others on the team, putting an end to the bank's one-year experiment with American financial technology.

    In January, as delinquencies on loans that backed Mizuho's CDOs increased, Aardvark, Tigris and Delphinus went into default. Subsequent downgrades of all of the tranches of Tigris and Aardvark required the bank to write down the value of the CDOs.

    Mizuho had to inject 150 billion yen of capital into its securities unit, shelve a planned merger with Shinko Securities Co. and axe 300 jobs. The bank's shares lost half their value in the fiscal year ended March 31.

    When a record 2,474 shareholders gathered at the Tokyo International Forum on June 26 for the bank's annual meeting, they were out for blood.

    ``The responsibility rests at the top with Maeda,'' Kenjiro Endo, 66, who bought Mizuho shares when he retired from chipmaker Toshiba Corp. six years ago, said after the meeting. ``If this were overseas, he'd resign.''

    `Market Crashed'

    Endo may have had a point. Citigroup CEO Charles O. ``Chuck'' Prince, Merrill's Stan O'Neal and Wachovia Corp.'s Kennedy Thompson were all forced to resign after significant subprime losses. In Japan, where executives often bow and apologize for their mistakes, Mizuho's Maeda stood firm.

    ``Unfortunately, from October, the securitized investment- product market crashed, and even if we tried to sell the investments, it wasn't possible,'' Maeda said at the shareholders' meeting. ``When the market stops functioning, there is no measure to avoid it.''

    Maeda also defended the bank's decision to enter the U.S. securities market.

    ``It's not because of some management failure that things turned out like this,'' he said. ``I am very sorry to tell you, doing nothing, and not taking risk, is not a bank.''

    Failure to Hedge

    Yet Mizuho might have incurred half as many losses if it had accelerated the sale of subprime-related investments and hedged more bets with credit-default swaps, according to a person familiar with its U.S. operations. The bank, fearing it would lose as much as two-thirds of its potential profit, decided not to hedge, the person said. Mizuho declined to comment.

    ``The holding company was unable to grasp the size of losses at Mizuho Securities when the subprime problem emerged,'' said Keisuke Moriyama, a Tokyo-based analyst at Nomura Holdings Inc. ``Mizuho has a governance problem. How it fixes it is the biggest issue that faces the group.''

    The ultimate cost to Mizuho may be greater than the 672 billion yen it wrote down. The bank, the first in Japan to put money in U.S. financials amid the credit crunch, invested $1.2 billion in Merrill in January. The Wall Street bank's shares have slumped 70 percent this year.

    `Missed Out'

    Now Mizuho is sidelined as other Japanese banks swoop in to buy troubled U.S. assets. Nomura purchased some of Lehman's Asian and European businesses in September, and Mitsubishi UFJ, the nation's largest bank, acquired 21 percent of Morgan Stanley for $9 billion.

    ``Mizuho has totally missed out,'' said Amir Anvarzadeh, director of Japanese equity sales at KBC Financial Products in London. ``They've been very aggressive overseas, trying to grow this business organically, and some of those ambitions have come back to haunt them.''

    Although it was the biggest loser, Mizuho wasn't the only Japanese bank that got hurt. In all, 672 domestic banks and credit cooperatives had 1.5 trillion yen in losses from overseas securitized products, the country's financial regulator reported Sept. 4.

    Rekeda, meanwhile, has moved on. He now works for Guggenheim Capital Markets LLC in New York, along with Paolo Torti and Xavier Capdepon, who both followed him from Calyon to Mizuho. Their new jobs: selling distressed CDOs at a discount. (!)

Source: here

Prem Watsa: The Man Who Beat The Shorts

Blogged last month: Prem Watsa Explains Why This Will Be A Long And Deep Recession Globally!

So who is Prem Watsa?




The Forbes recently has a nice coverage on Prem and his Fairfax International:
The Man Who Beat The Shorts
  • In the current economic meltdown Prem Wasta and his Fairfax Financial are among the few winners.

    Did short-sellers make the market go down? Maybe, maybe not. But here's one stock they tried, and failed, to send into a tailspin: Fairfax Financial Holdings. From Labor Day through Oct. 23, when the market fell 29%, Fairfax was up 18% on the New York Stock Exchange, from $216 to $255.

    Fairfax is an insurance company in Toronto that took in $4.5 billion last year in net premiums on policies that cover property and casualty or reinsure other insurers' liabilities. It is the creation of V. Prem Watsa, 58, an immigrant from India and an investing genius. If not a genius, he is one of the luckiest gamblers around. He's been bearish for several years and by January had 80% of his firm's $20 billion portfolio in cash and U.S. Treasurys.

    Despite, or because of, Watsa's history in building up Fairfax from the remnants of an almost busted trucking insurer that he took over in 1985, short-sellers figured that he would make a good target. They started spreading the theory that the rapidly growing firm was underreserved. The battle got ugly at times, if there's any truth to the accusations in a lawsuit Watsa filed in 2006 against his Wall Street enemies, charging them with market manipulation. Among those accusations, which are all denied:

    --Using the pseudonym P. Fate, unnamed individuals sent a package to the pastor of the church where Watsa presides over the investment committee, warning that Watsa's activities resembled those of convicted insurance felon Martin Frankel.

    --Hedge funds shorting Fairfax stock put out wild assertions that the company was the next Enron.

    --The shorts got someone to approach Fairfax's former chief financial officer, heavy-handedly threatening criminal prosecution if he didn't cooperate by revealing incriminating details.

    --On one day in June 2006 Fairfax Chief Financial Officer

    Greg Taylor fielded 41 telephone calls from investors checking out rumors they had heard: that the Mounties had raided the office, that the company was admitting fraud and that Watsa had fled the country with company assets. One caller even demanded Watsa be put on the phone to prove his presence.

    The suit, in New Jersey state court, is far from resolution (a trial is expected next year), but Fairfax go some vindication two months ago when one defendant, the brokerage firm Morgan Keegan, announced that it had fired its analyst covering Fairfax for having given advance word of negative reports to short-sellers and hedge funds. In the end, though, Watsa seems to be beating the shorts not with legal tactics but the old-fashioned way, by running a good company. Earnings per share shot up from $12 in 2006 to $58 in 2007, and in the first half of this year to $35. Since the shorts took on Fairfax in earnest starting in 2003, the stock has tripled.

    Born in India, Watsa graduated from the prestigious Indian Institute of Technology and moved to western Ontario in 1972 at age 22. Penniless, he lived with relatives while getting his M.B.A. from the University of Western Ontario and moonlighting at night selling air conditioners and furnaces. After taking over, and renaming, an underwriter of trucking policies called Markel, he added a dozen property and casualty insurers, among them the well-known New Jersey firm Crum & Forster and TIG Holdings, once part of San Francisco's Transamerica.

    Taking over management of the investments, Watsa produced (according to Fairfax) a compound annual return from 1993 to 2007 on its stock portfolio of 19.5% (versus 10.4% for the S&P 500) and on its bond portfolio of 10.1% (versus 6.6% for a Merrill Lynch bond index). One of his earliest backers--and later a friend--was famed investor Sir John Templeton, who died this year at age 95.

    The short-seller interest in Fairfax dates to the early 2000s, when debt-laden acquisitions started to produce huge claims on policies written before Watsa's watch. Even when he was forced to shut down troubled acquisition TIG while turning around Crum, Watsa was able to pay claims with $1.4 billion worth of reinsurance he had acquired. He also raised $1.2 billion with share offerings for some of Fairfax's subsidiaries and Fairfax itself.

    The arm-wrestling with the shorts had Fairfax shares oscillating between $48 and $185 in the three and a half years before the company filed its lawsuit. "We have nothing against short-selling," Watsa says now. "We short stocks ourselves." And he takes bearish positions on other companies' debt. In 2003 and 2004 he spent $467 million on credit-default swaps against an assortment of borrowers, among them American International Group, Countrywide Financial and MBIA. So far Watsa has booked a $2.5 billion gain on those positions.

    Watsa's only sin was in being a little too early with his prediction that the era of credit expansion would end badly.
    This is what he said in Fairfax's 2003 annual report: "It seems to us that securitization eliminates the incentive for the originator of [a] loan to be credit sensitive. Prior to securitization, the dealer would be very concerned about who was given credit to buy an automobile. With securitization, the dealer (almost) does not care.…And here's the rub! These asset-backed bonds are rated based on their historical loss experience record which will likely be very different in the future--particularly if we experience difficult economic times."

China Will Be Hit Hard, Warns BOC Executive

Posted on Singapore Business Times..

  • November 1, 2008, 2.39 pm (Singapore time)

    China to be hit hard by global recession: BOC exec

    SHANGHAI - A global recession will have a huge impact on China's economy while currency volatility is expected to add further pressure on the country's banks, a top executive at Bank of China (BOC) said on Saturday.

    'Next year, the global economy is very likely to enter recession and the world's biggest economies, including the United States, Europe and Japan, are very likely to post negative growth and that will have a huge impact on China,' executive vice president Zhu Min told a financial conference in Shanghai.

    'The impact of the crisis on China has just started to appear as China has already seen a sharp slowdown in industrial profit growth and fiscal income,' he said.

    'The financial crisis will technically precede economic and political turmoil by eight to 12 months,' he added.

    China's banks have enjoyed robust profits for years as the country boomed but earnings growth is now slowing as the economy cools from the impact of the global financial crisis.

    Although China's banks have manageable holdings of sub-prime-mortgage-related debt, they are exposed to huge foreign currency trading risk from turbulent financial markets.

    'The uncertainties in the world's currency markets have exposed the Chinese banking sector to higher foreign asset risk,' Mr Zhu said.

    BOC, the country's flagship foreign exchange lender, said on Wednesday profit growth slowed to 12 per cent during the third quarter, from 43 per cent in the first half.

    The lender had US$6.2 billion worth of debt issued by troubled US mortgage companies Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae by the end of September, and was carrying US$3.3 billion of sub-prime-related securities.

    Mr Zhu said several factors will hurt the banking sector's bottom line such as the possible deterioration of banks' asset quality as economic growth slows, and shrinking interest margins due to the global trend of interest rate cuts.

    He expects the industry to face tougher regulations and supervision of derivative products in future.

    BOC's focus on trade finance loans means rapidly slowing world demand for Chinese goods will put additional pressure on the lender's loan growth and asset quality, Deutsche Bank said in a recent report.

    China's economy grew 11.9 per cent in 2007, but that rate slowed to 9.9 per cent in the first three quarters of this year.

    China's manufacturing sector contracted sharply in October, an official monthly survey showed on Saturday, providing more evidence the global financial crisis was taking a toll on the once roaring Chinese economy.

Source: http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/sub/latest/story/0,4574,303766,00.html?

Is there any substance to such view?

How about the following news article on Bloomberg.

  • China Manufacturing Contracts as Crisis Trims Exports

    By Li Yanping and Wang Ying

    Nov. 1 (Bloomberg) -- China's manufacturing contracted as the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression eroded export demand.

    The Purchasing Managers' Index fell to a seasonally adjusted 44.6 last month from 51.2 in September, the China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing said today in an e-mailed statement. That was the lowest since the gauge was launched in July 2005. A reading below 50 reflects a contraction, above 50 an expansion.

    China's cabinet has pledged extra infrastructure spending to stimulate the world's fourth-biggest economy amid the global slowdown. The government has already lowered rates three times in the past two months, increased export rebates and cut property transaction taxes.

    ``The government needs effective stimulus measures to spur growth,'' said Wang Qian, a Hong Kong-based economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. ``The external economic outlook is worsening rapidly.''

    Manufacturing contracted in July for the first time since the survey began in 2005. It also shrank in August. The October index was a record low.

    China's economy grew at the slowest pace in five years in the three months through September as export orders shrank and industrial production waned. The expansion cooled for a fifth straight quarter, to a 9 percent gain from a year earlier.

    Global Slowdown

    Chinalco Luoyang Copper Co., a Chinese processor of the metal, said orders fell 20 percent in the third quarter as domestic and international demand weakened.

    The global slowdown is curbing demand for the nation's goods. The International Monetary Fund estimates that advanced economies will expand 0.5 percent next year, the slowest pace since 1982.

    Falling property sales and prices in major cities are another drag on China's growth.

    The index is based on a survey of more than 700 companies in 20 industries, including energy, metallurgy, textile, automobiles and electronics.

    The output index fell to 44.3 in October from 54.6 in September, while the index of new orders dropped to 41.7 percent from 51.3. The index of export orders declined to 41.4 percent from 48.8, the statement said.

    The inventory index climbed to 51.4 from 50.5, it said.

Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601089&sid=asxpXKBhstjU&refer=china

On an another article posted on NewYorkTimes.

  • China has long been at the center of claims that the world could keep growing regardless of American troubles. China has been importing cotton from India and the United States; electronics components from South Korea, Malaysia and Taiwan; timber from Russia and Africa; and oil from the Middle East.

    But many of the finished goods China produces with these materials have ultimately landed in the United States, Europe and Japan. When consumers pull back in those countries, Chinese factories feel the impact, along with their suppliers around the globe.

    Fewer laptop computers shipped from China spells less demand for chips. Last week, Toshiba — Japan’s largest chip maker — said it lost $275 million from July to September, blaming its troubles on a world glut.

    Lower demand for flat-screen televisions means less need for flat-panel glass displays. This month, Samsung, the Korean electronics giant, said a global oversupply in that item caused its biggest dip in quarterly profits in three years.

    Now, a glut of products may be building in the United States. Orders for trucks used by business have plummeted. Investments in industrial equipment are declining. Yet inventories have grown.

Source: Fear of Deflation Lurks as Global Demand Drops

Saturday, November 01, 2008

Massive Warnings From Shippers On Their Drying Baltic Dry Index

Ok, the Baltic Dry Index has plunged again. The index is now at 851 points!

Now this is not what I want to post today.

Susan Lee has written a decent write on the Baltic Dry Index on Forbes the very last two passages summarizes why the Index is so important.


  • A major factor behind the run-up was, of course, the commodity bubble. And the Baldry proved its worth as a leading indicator by turning down two months before that bubble burst. Plus, I would also point out, the Baldry forecast the slowing growth in China. Chinese demand for raw materials from the West--including a ravenous appetite for coal and iron ore--has been fierce. Some say it's been a critical driver of the Baldry. So the announcement a few weeks ago that growth in China has slowed wasn't news to those who've been following the six-month collapse of the Baltic Dry Index.

    Simply put, if you're in the market for a quick and efficient way to spot the bottom of the global recession, watching the Baltic Dry is a very good bet.

Source: http://www.forbes.com/opinions/2008/10/30/baldry-baltic-index-oped-cx_sl_1031lee.html

And for the following two articles from two shipping giants highlights how dire the situation is.

  • Oct. 31 (Bloomberg) -- Goldenport Holdings Plc, a U.K-listed shipowner, fell by a record amount in London trading after saying trade in commodity shipping has ``virtually halted.''

    Goldenport fell as much as 21 percent to 88 pence before closing at 93 pence, valuing the company at 65 million pounds ($105 million). The stock has plunged 78 percent this year, compared with a 52 percent drop in the nine-member FTSE All-Share Industrial Transportation Index. The shares started trading in March 2006.

    ``Activity in the dry-bulk segment has virtually halted, with minimal trade taking place globally,'' Chief Executive Officer Paris Dragnis said in a statement today. Future leases will probably earn ``significantly lower rates.''

    The company, based in Majuro, Marshall Islands, said customers who hired its vessels will likely return them as soon as they can, cutting contracted sales for the three years to 2010 by 8 percent to $324 million. One of its customers is Britannia Bulk Holdings Inc., which on Oct. 29 said its lenders asked for immediate repayment of $158.7 million outstanding on a loan.

    The Baltic Dry Index, a measure of freight costs on international trade routes, has dropped 93 percent since May amid an iron-ore price dispute between China and Brazil and a freeze in the supply of credit to purchase cargoes.

    The shipping line said the Achim, a container ship, was returned by a customer a month earlier than ``initially agreed,'' causing Goldenport to incur $700,000 in fuel and port fees. The ship was sold for demolition.

    ``I would like them to clarify what risks they have under each vessel,'' said Alex Chan, a London-based analyst at NBG International Ltd., who cut his rating on the stock to ``hold'' from ``buy'' on Oct. 28. ``I would like to see what other parties they deal with so we can analyze what risks are involved.''

    Goldenport's protection and indemnity insurer is facing a ``growing deficit'' and will charge the shipping line $2 million as a one-off fee, the company said. ( Source:
    here )

WOW!

  • ``Activity in the dry-bulk segment has virtually halted, with minimal trade taking place globally,'' Chief Executive Officer Paris Dragnis said in a statement today. Future leases will probably earn ``significantly lower rates.''

That one statement above is outright scary. We are not talking just talking about lower shipping rates but that the activity has halted brings a whole new perspective to the shipping industry!

On Bangkok Post, one should really pay attention to what Chandchutha Chandratat, managing director of Thoresen Thai Agencies Plc (TTA) is saying. TTA: Rate plunge will hurt

  • Thoresen Thai Agencies Plc (TTA), the country's biggest dry bulk shipper, says a sharp drop in freight rates in the wake of the global credit crunch would hit its results in the next two years.

    Shipping rates have plunged to a six-year low as cargoes are stranded by tighter trade finance and the global economic slowdown curbs demand for raw materials, said M.L. Chandchutha Chandratat, the TTA managing director.

    ''Traders are finding it hard to get letters of credit that guarantee payments for goods, while banks are wary of financing commodities and shipping transactions,'' he said.
    ''This symptom has already been felt, and yes, this is going to hit us in 2009 and 2010.''

    The Baltic Dry Index, the main gauge of shipping costs for commodities, fell 5.8% to 925 on Wednesday, down 92% from its peak in May at 11,793.

    TTA earned 4.97 billion baht on revenues of 21.3 billion last year.

    ''2008 will be the year we break all our records in terms of both profit and sales,'' M.L. Chandchutha said of full-year results due for release on Nov 28.

    He did not give a specific forecast, but 11 analysts polled by Reuters Estimates expect TTA to post a 57% rise in 2008 net profit to 7.8 billion baht, on revenues of 30.2 billion, up 42%.
    The company's 10 billion baht in cash and its low debt would help it to weather the financial storm, he said.

    To help offset the impact of a slowing world economy, the company planned to look at investments in energy and infrastructure, M.L. Chandchutha said.

    TTA had no plans to cut capacity yet, ''but we won't make any investments for at least three to six months'', he said.

    TTA shares, down nearly 80% this year after peaking at 56 baht in May, closed yesterday on the Stock Exchange of Thailand at 10.70 baht, up 85 satang, in trade worth 490.93 million baht.

    While some companies have taken advantage of the stock slump to buy back their shares, M.L. Chandchutha said he had no such plans.

    ''Buying back shares hasn't really stopped foreign funds from selling,'' he said.

And it makes one wonder why the Malaysian bulk shippers have chosen to remain silent now.

Other postings that matter:

1. Views On Current Weakness On Baltic Dry Index
2.
The Collapse of the Baltic Dry Index
3.
Goldman Downgrades Bulk Shippers!
4.
Baltic Dry Index Keeps Falling!
5.
Baltic Dry Index Stages Strong Rebound!
6.
Baltic Dry Index Set For Strong Recovery???
7.
Baltic Dry Index Plunges To Seven Month Lows!
8.
The Baltic Dry Index Keeps On Plunging!
9.
Baltic Dry Index Continues To Plunge
10.
The Plunging Baltic Dry Index And The Dangers Of Using Forward PE!
11.
Baltic Dry Plunges Below 2000!!!
12.
Admist The Plunging Baltic Dry Index, Dr. Marc Faber Warns That Some Shipping Lines Could Go Bankrupt!
13.
Comments Heard Admist The Plunging Baltic Dry Index ( recommended reading!)
14. Shipping Giant Neptune Orient Lines (NOL) Warns of Losses!